M. Latimer

24 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

M. Latimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Internal Medicine 23
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 32
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 84
  • Surgery 168
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 59
Replace Temel Tombul with:
Temel Tombul Türkiye
Parker Mickle United States
Lucy Marshall United Kingdom
James P. Caruso United States
Sibel Canbaz Kabay Türkiye
Sevda İsmailoğulları Türkiye
Hung Youl Seok South Korea
Figen Gökçay Türkiye
Thomas Moores United Kingdom
Friedrich Rosen Germany
M. Latimer relative to Temel Tombul Türkiye Temel Tombul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Temel Tombul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Latimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Latimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Latimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Latimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Latimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Latimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Latimer. The network helps show where M. Latimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Latimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Latimer Line = papers co-authored together M. Latimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201175
2 199258
3 199241
4 200436
5 200532
6 199029
7 201725
8 200222
9 201311
10 199411
11 201510
12 20147
13 20187
14 20155
15 20165
16 20144
17 20144
18 20193
19 20113
20 19903

About M. Latimer

M. Latimer is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (4 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (2 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (23 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (32 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (84 citations), Surgery (168 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (59 citations). M. Latimer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include E.L. Rugg, Philip Winn, Michael Bellemore, David G. Little, Oliver Birke, Helen Seeley, H. J. C. R. BELCHER, David L. Wallace, Piers D. Mitchell and Rodney J. Laing. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Injury, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Open Forum Infectious Diseases and Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact