M. Langley

511 citations
23 papers · 373 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

M. Langley

19 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

M. Langley
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Reproductive Medicine 233
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 247
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 334
  • Molecular Biology 78
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 7
Replace Martine Dumont-Hassan with:
Martine Dumont-Hassan France
F Cerusico Italy
V Distratis Italy
Kenichiro Hiraoka Japan
Kazuo Kinutani Japan
Amy Barrie United Kingdom
Kaori Hiraoka Japan
R Comi Italy
Fabio Sapienza Italy
Jin-Tae Chung Canada
M. Langley relative to Martine Dumont-Hassan France Martine Dumont-Hassan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Martine Dumont-Hassan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Langley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Langley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Langley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Langley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Langley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Langley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Langley. The network helps show where M. Langley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside M. Langley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Langley Line = papers co-authored together M. Langley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999139
2 200191
3 200775
4 200115
5 200614
6 20019
7 20035
8 20014
9 20054
10
Methadone dosage levels, positive urine tests and length of time in a methadone treatment program.
19732
11 20042
12 20042
13 20032
14 20042
15 20001
16 20021
17 20041
18 20021
19 20051
20 20031

About M. Langley

M. Langley is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine, Physiology and Gender Studies, having authored 23 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (20 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (14 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (10 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (6 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (1 paper) and Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (233 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (247 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (334 citations), Molecular Biology (78 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (7 citations). M. Langley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kevin J. Doody, K.M. Doody, David K. Gardner, Anna C Nackley, Khurram Rehman, Orhan Bükülmez, Bruce R. Carr, Christina Masciangelo, Jeanine Cieslak and Barbara E. Norris. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Human Reproduction and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact