M John Bankart
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Richard BakerGeorge FreemanKeith NockelsJeannie HaggertyTheresa Harvey‐DunstanSally SinghSana HussainEmma Chaplin
- Topics
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes (13 papers)Healthcare Policy and Management (12 papers)Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers)
- Cited by
- General Health ProfessionsIssues, ethics and legal aspectsPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Journals
- JAMACHEST JournalBMJ
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
M John Bankart
27 papers receiving 830 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- General Health Professions 338
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 287
- Economics and Econometrics 216
- Epidemiology 170
- Surgery 102
Countries citing papers authored by M John Bankart
This map shows the geographic impact of M John Bankart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M John Bankart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M John Bankart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M John Bankart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M John Bankart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M John Bankart. The network helps show where M John Bankart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M John Bankart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M John Bankart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M John Bankart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M John Bankart. M John Bankart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 155 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 197 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 69 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About M John Bankart
M John Bankart is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 846 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (13 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (12 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (338 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (287 citations). M John Bankart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard Baker, George Freeman, Keith Nockels, Jeannie Haggerty, Theresa Harvey‐Dunstan, Sally Singh, Sana Hussain, Emma Chaplin, Johanna Williams and Emma E. Vincent. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, CHEST Journal and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.