Emma Chaplin

1.3k total citations
35 papers, 741 citations indexed

About

Emma Chaplin is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Chaplin has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 741 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 7 papers in Neurology and 7 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Emma Chaplin's work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (28 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (16 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (6 papers). Emma Chaplin is often cited by papers focused on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (28 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (16 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (6 papers). Emma Chaplin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Emma Chaplin's co-authors include Sally Singh, Neil Greening, Michael Steiner, Enya Daynes, Theresa Harvey‐Dunstan, Nikki Gardiner, Johanna Williams, Emma E. Vincent, Mike Morgan and Sana Hussain and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, BMJ and Thorax.

In The Last Decade

Emma Chaplin

33 papers receiving 725 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Chaplin United Kingdom 12 478 168 130 122 115 35 741
Elisabetta Zampogna Italy 15 446 0.9× 201 1.2× 209 1.6× 66 0.5× 88 0.8× 46 775
Tristan Bonnevie France 16 493 1.0× 146 0.9× 91 0.7× 124 1.0× 205 1.8× 60 768
Francis‐Edouard Gravier France 16 495 1.0× 146 0.9× 91 0.7× 124 1.0× 201 1.7× 56 769
Clément Médrinal France 15 437 0.9× 96 0.6× 78 0.6× 63 0.5× 194 1.7× 65 625
Guillaume Prieur France 15 403 0.8× 95 0.6× 76 0.6× 61 0.5× 180 1.6× 60 592
Kathryn M. Milne Canada 15 503 1.1× 114 0.7× 163 1.3× 106 0.9× 28 0.2× 33 652
J.J. Miranda Geelhoed Netherlands 14 181 0.4× 368 2.2× 62 0.5× 77 0.6× 146 1.3× 28 1.0k
Mariana Hoffman Brazil 13 342 0.7× 71 0.4× 91 0.7× 47 0.4× 43 0.4× 37 486
Carla Simonelli Italy 9 222 0.5× 257 1.5× 49 0.4× 39 0.3× 126 1.1× 19 481
Manuela Karloh Brazil 14 588 1.2× 41 0.2× 218 1.7× 100 0.8× 20 0.2× 51 805

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Chaplin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Chaplin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Chaplin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Chaplin. The network helps show where Emma Chaplin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Chaplin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Chaplin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Chaplin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Chaplin. Emma Chaplin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Daynes, Enya, Molly M Baldwin, Nikki Gardiner, et al.. (2024). Changes in fatigue symptoms following an exercise-based rehabilitation programme for patients with long COVID. ERJ Open Research. 10(4). 89–2024. 3 indexed citations
2.
Man, William D‐C, Emma Chaplin, Enya Daynes, et al.. (2023). British Thoracic Society Clinical Statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. Thorax. 78(Suppl 5). s2–s15. 35 indexed citations
3.
Richardson, Matthew, Neil Greening, Dale Esliger, et al.. (2022). A proof of concept for continuous, non-invasive, free-living vital signs monitoring to predict readmission following an acute exacerbation of COPD: a prospective cohort study. Respiratory Research. 23(1). 102–102. 9 indexed citations
4.
Greening, Neil, Dale Esliger, Matthew Richardson, et al.. (2022). Usability of Wearable Multiparameter Technology to Continuously Monitor Free-Living Vital Signs in People Living With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Prospective Observational Study. JMIR Human Factors. 9(1). e30091–e30091. 13 indexed citations
5.
Chaplin, Emma, et al.. (2022). The minimum important difference for the PREM-9 following a course of Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR). 2899–2899. 1 indexed citations
6.
Baldwin, Molly M, et al.. (2022). Public Use of the “Your COVID Recovery” Website Designed to Help Individuals Manage Their COVID-19 Recovery: Observational Study. JMIR Formative Research. 7. e37811–e37811. 1 indexed citations
7.
Gardiner, Nikki, et al.. (2022). The Recovery Journey and the Rehabilitation Boat - A qualitative study to explore experiences of COVID-19 rehabilitation. Chronic Respiratory Disease. 19. 4063538586–4063538586. 6 indexed citations
8.
Daynes, Enya, et al.. (2021). Early experiences of rehabilitation for individuals post-COVID to improve fatigue, breathlessness exercise capacity and cognition – A cohort study. Chronic Respiratory Disease. 18. 4053440011–4053440011. 140 indexed citations
9.
Singh, Sally, et al.. (2021). Proposed MID in FACIT and VAS scores for individuals attending COVID-19 rehabilitation. OA162–OA162. 3 indexed citations
11.
Chaplin, Emma, et al.. (2021). Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. 9(1). e28875–e28875. 5 indexed citations
13.
14.
Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy, Enya Daynes, Amye Watt, et al.. (2020). Which functional outcome measures can we use as a surrogate for exercise capacity during remote cardiopulmonary rehabilitation assessments? A rapid narrative review. ERJ Open Research. 6(4). 526–2020. 14 indexed citations
15.
Chaplin, Emma, Lindsay Apps, John Bankart, et al.. (2017). Interactive web-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme: a randomised controlled feasibility trial. BMJ Open. 7(3). e013682–e013682. 91 indexed citations
16.
Greening, Neil, Theresa Harvey‐Dunstan, Emma Chaplin, et al.. (2015). Bedside Assessment of Quadriceps Muscle by Ultrasound after Admission for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Respiratory Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 192(7). 810–816. 83 indexed citations
17.
Chaplin, Emma, Lindsay Apps, Kelly Edwards, et al.. (2015). The evaluation of an interactive web-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme: protocol for the WEB SPACE for COPD feasibility study. BMJ Open. 5(8). e008055–e008055. 17 indexed citations
18.
Chaplin, Emma, Michelle Gibb, Louise Sewell, & Sally Singh. (2014). Response of the COPD Assessment Tool in Stable and Postexacerbation Pulmonary Rehabilitation Populations. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention. 35(3). 214–218. 6 indexed citations
19.
Greening, Neil, Johanna Williams, Sana Hussain, et al.. (2014). An early rehabilitation intervention to enhance recovery during hospital admission for an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 349(jul08 5). g4315–g4315. 197 indexed citations
20.
Chaplin, Emma, Neil Greening, Theresa Harvey‐Dunstan, et al.. (2010). Neuromuscular Stimulation Of Quadriceps In Acutely Unwell Hospitalised Patients: A Comparison Of Low (35Hz) And High (50Hz) Frequencies. A3765–A3765. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026