Emma Chaplin
-
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research 28
- Respiratory Support and Mechanisms 16
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 6
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 10%
-
- Cardiac Health and Mental Health 6
-
- Delphi Technique in Research 4
-
- Chronic Disease Management Strategies 3
-
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 3
-
- Cancer survivorship and care 2
- Co-authors
- Sally SinghNeil GreeningMichael SteinerEnya DaynesTheresa Harvey‐DunstanNikki GardinerJohanna WilliamsEmma E. Vincent
- Cited by
- Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicinePulmonary and Respiratory MedicineIssues, ethics and legal aspects
- Journals
- Chronic Respiratory Disease (3 papers)BMJ Open Respiratory Research (2 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emma Chaplin
33 papers receiving 725 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 115
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 478
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 18
- Neurology 168
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Chaplin
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Chaplin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Chaplin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Chaplin. The network helps show where Emma Chaplin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Chaplin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 140 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 91 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 83 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 197 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 1 |
About Emma Chaplin
Emma Chaplin is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Library and Information Sciences, having authored 35 papers that have together received 741 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (28 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (16 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (6 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (6 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (115 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (478 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (18 citations). Emma Chaplin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sally Singh, Neil Greening, Michael Steiner, Enya Daynes, Theresa Harvey‐Dunstan, Nikki Gardiner, Johanna Williams, Emma E. Vincent, Mike Morgan and Sana Hussain. Their work appears in journals such as Chronic Respiratory Disease, BMJ Open Respiratory Research, BMJ Open, Respiratory Research and ERJ Open Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.