George Freeman

4.8k total citations
74 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

George Freeman is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, George Freeman has authored 74 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in General Health Professions, 24 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 14 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in George Freeman's work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (38 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (23 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (12 papers). George Freeman is often cited by papers focused on Primary Care and Health Outcomes (38 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (23 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (12 papers). George Freeman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. George Freeman's co-authors include Jeannie Haggerty, Richard Baker, Danièle Roberge, Per Hjortdahl, Christine Beaulieu, David Heaney, J. G. R. Howie, Jeremy Walker, Margaret Maxwell and Bruce Guthrie and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and BMJ.

In The Last Decade

George Freeman

69 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George Freeman United Kingdom 27 2.0k 943 502 445 333 74 2.7k
Jordon Peugh United States 14 1.4k 0.7× 738 0.8× 547 1.1× 244 0.5× 245 0.7× 15 2.3k
Marc Bruijnzeels Netherlands 26 1.4k 0.7× 298 0.3× 606 1.2× 512 1.2× 244 0.7× 78 2.5k
Iona Heath United Kingdom 23 1.4k 0.7× 806 0.9× 209 0.4× 346 0.8× 111 0.3× 93 2.2k
Justin Beilby Australia 32 1.4k 0.7× 501 0.5× 399 0.8× 603 1.4× 131 0.4× 154 2.9k
Cor Spreeuwenberg Netherlands 27 1.4k 0.7× 420 0.4× 588 1.2× 624 1.4× 135 0.4× 73 2.3k
Erin Strumpf Canada 26 1.1k 0.6× 516 0.5× 631 1.3× 286 0.6× 117 0.4× 110 2.4k
Rachel Willard‐Grace United States 22 1.7k 0.9× 365 0.4× 287 0.6× 552 1.2× 249 0.7× 53 2.2k
Ewout van Ginneken Germany 22 1.2k 0.6× 746 0.8× 466 0.9× 217 0.5× 124 0.4× 80 2.0k
Jonathan B. VanGeest United States 18 1.4k 0.7× 304 0.3× 256 0.5× 521 1.2× 137 0.4× 37 2.6k
JoAnn E. Kirchner United States 11 2.8k 1.4× 545 0.6× 334 0.7× 639 1.4× 72 0.2× 13 3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by George Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Freeman. The network helps show where George Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Freeman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Freeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Freeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Freeman. George Freeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Baker, Richard, et al.. (2024). The decline in relationship continuity in England: can a European perspective help?. British Journal of General Practice. 74(743). 279–282.
2.
Levene, Louis S, et al.. (2024). Ongoing Decline in Continuity With GPs in English General Practices: A Longitudinal Study Across the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Annals of Family Medicine. 22(4). 301–308. 6 indexed citations
3.
Baker, Richard, Louis S Levene, Chris Newby, & George Freeman. (2023). Does shortage of GPs matter? A cross-sectional study of practice population life expectancy. British Journal of General Practice. 74(742). e283–e289. 8 indexed citations
4.
Baker, Richard, George Freeman, Jeannie Haggerty, M John Bankart, & Keith Nockels. (2020). Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice. 70(698). e600–e611. 155 indexed citations
5.
Freeman, George, et al.. (2015). Micro-teams for better continuity in Tower Hamlets: we have a problem but we’re working on a promising solution!. British Journal of General Practice. 65(639). 536–536. 8 indexed citations
6.
Reeve, Joanne, Thomas Blakeman, George Freeman, et al.. (2013). Generalist solutions to complex problems: generating practice-based evidence - the example of managing multi-morbidity. BMC Family Practice. 14(1). 112–112. 62 indexed citations
7.
Freeman, George. (2012). Progress with Relationship Continuity 2012, a British perspective. International Journal of Integrated Care. 12(2). e128–e128. 14 indexed citations
8.
Reeve, Joanne, Greg Irving, & George Freeman. (2012). Dismantling Lord Moran’s ladder: the primary care expert generalist. British Journal of General Practice. 63(606). 34–35. 9 indexed citations
9.
Guthrie, Bruce, John Saultz, George Freeman, & Jeannie Haggerty. (2008). Continuity of care matters. BMJ. 337(aug07 1). a867–a867. 186 indexed citations
10.
Lusignan, Simon de, Pushpa Kumarapeli, Tom Chan, et al.. (2008). The ALFA (Activity Log Files Aggregation) Toolkit: A Method for Precise Observation of the Consultation. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 10(4). e27–e27. 19 indexed citations
11.
Weel, Chris van, Bengt Mattsson, George Freeman, Marc De Meyere, & Martin von Fragstein. (2005). General Practice based Teaching Exchanges in Europe. European Journal of General Practice. 11(3-4). 122–126. 4 indexed citations
12.
Freeman, George, et al.. (2003). Towards best practices in software teamwork. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 19(2). 72–81. 15 indexed citations
13.
Freeman, George. (2003). Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice?. Family Practice. 20(6). 623–627. 118 indexed citations
14.
Grant, Andrew, Anita Berlin, & George Freeman. (2003). Short CommunicationThe impact of a student learning journal: a two-stage evaluation using the Nominal Group Technique. Medical Teacher. 25(6). 659–661. 16 indexed citations
15.
Ehrich, Kathryn, et al.. (2002). How to do a scoping exercise: continuity of care. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 53 indexed citations
16.
Freeman, George, et al.. (2002). Non-English speakers consulting with the GP in their own language: a cross-sectional survey.. PubMed. 52(474). 36–8. 30 indexed citations
17.
Freeman, George, et al.. (2001). An exploration of the value of the personal doctor-patient relationship in general practice.. PubMed. 51(470). 712–8. 143 indexed citations
18.
Freeman, George, et al.. (1993). Is personal continuity of care compatible with free choice of doctor? Patients' views on seeing the same doctor.. PubMed. 43(377). 493–7. 43 indexed citations
19.
Freeman, George & C. R. COLES. (1985). Preregistration rotation including general practice. BMJ. 291(6490). 281.1–281. 1 indexed citations
20.
Freeman, George. (1978). Analysis of primary care prescribing--a "constructive" coding system for drugs.. PubMed. 28(194). 547–51. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026