M. Jaščur

2.0k citations
90 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

M. Jaščur

88 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

M. Jaščur
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.6k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 480
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
  • Mathematical Physics 121
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 245
Replace I. P. Fittipaldi with:
I. P. Fittipaldi Brazil
A. Bobák Slovakia
Raimundo R. dos Santos Brazil
Marco Picco France
F. C. Sá Barreto Brazil
Hans Gerd Evertz Austria
Wenan Guo China
S. E. Korshunov Russia
Erik S. Sørensen Canada
Jing-Huei Chen United States
M. Jaščur relative to I. P. Fittipaldi Brazil I. P. Fittipaldi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
I. P. Fittipaldi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Jaščur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Jaščur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Jaščur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Jaščur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Jaščur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Jaščur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Jaščur. The network helps show where M. Jaščur may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Jaščur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Jaščur Line = papers co-authored together M. Jaščur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20224
3 20203
4 20203
5 201718
6 20169
7 201413
8 20086
9 200410
10 20024
11 200114
12 200017
13 199613
14 199517
15 199324
16 199325
17 199332
18 1993106
19 199227
20 1992182

About M. Jaščur

M. Jaščur is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Geometry and Topology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (74 papers), Quantum many-body systems (46 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (25 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (16 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (15 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (12 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (10 papers) and Material Dynamics and Properties (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.6k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (480 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations), Mathematical Physics (121 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (245 citations). M. Jaščur has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Japan and Poland. Frequent co-authors include T. Kaneyoshi, Jozef Strečka, A. Bobák, J.W. Tucker, I. P. Fittipaldi, Denis Horváth, Piotr Tomczak, Masayuki Hagiwara, T. Balcerzak and Karol Szałowski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, physica status solidi (b) and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026