M. J. Cano‐Cebrián

475 citations
21 papers · 360 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

M. J. Cano‐Cebrián

21 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

M. J. Cano‐Cebrián
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Pharmaceutical Science 100
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 120
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Neurology 26
  • Developmental Neuroscience 12
Replace Eszter Ducza with:
Eszter Ducza Hungary
Kagemasa Kajiwara Japan
Muhammad Masood Ahmed Pakistan
Md. Akbar India
Lara Ordóñez‐Gutiérrez Spain
Boris Piskoun United States
Michael Weisspapir Canada
Víctor J. Asensio Spain
Valeria Calabrese Italy
Norihiro Shinkai Japan
M. J. Cano‐Cebrián relative to Eszter Ducza Hungary Eszter Ducza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Eszter Ducza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Cano‐Cebrián

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Cano‐Cebrián's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Cano‐Cebrián with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Cano‐Cebrián more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Cano‐Cebrián

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Cano‐Cebrián. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Cano‐Cebrián. The network helps show where M. J. Cano‐Cebrián may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside M. J. Cano‐Cebrián, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. J. Cano‐Cebrián Line = papers co-authored together M. J. Cano‐Cebrián links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005125
2 200334
3 200526
4 200526
5 200426
6 200618
7 200515
8 202015
9 202011
10 201311
11 202211
12 20169
13 20209
14 20228
15 20174
16 20234
17 20213
18 20142
19 20231
20 20151

About M. J. Cano‐Cebrián

M. J. Cano‐Cebrián is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Oncology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (3 papers) and Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (100 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (120 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations), Neurology (26 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (12 citations). M. J. Cano‐Cebrián has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Luis Granero, Ana Polache, Teodoro Zornoza, Consuelo Guerri, Hans Lennernäs, David Dahlgren, Markus Sjöblom, Lucía Hipólito, Lucía Martí‐Prats and Carlos M.G. Aragón. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Psychopharmacology, Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition, Alcohol and Alcoholism and Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact