M. Hüber

1.3k total citations
11 papers, 216 citations indexed

About

M. Hüber is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Hüber has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 216 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in M. Hüber's work include Nuclear physics research studies (5 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers). M. Hüber is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (5 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers). M. Hüber collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Russia. M. Hüber's co-authors include C. B. Collins, P. von Neumann–Cosel, J. J. Carroll, A. Richter, W. Ziegler, Rüdiger Kniep, Wilm‐Christian Haase, W. De Boer, C. Sander and N. Huxel and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B, Nuclear Physics A and Inorganica Chimica Acta.

In The Last Decade

M. Hüber

11 papers receiving 206 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Hüber Germany 8 124 72 59 33 24 11 216
Pierre de Marcillac France 6 123 1.0× 86 1.2× 84 1.4× 29 0.9× 52 2.2× 10 270
Alexander Gorbunov Russia 11 147 1.2× 42 0.6× 147 2.5× 28 0.8× 52 2.2× 27 353
Alpana Goel India 8 136 1.1× 29 0.4× 152 2.6× 9 0.3× 18 0.8× 35 313
S. Dalla Torre Italy 8 76 0.6× 69 1.0× 40 0.7× 23 0.7× 42 1.8× 43 187
F. C. Yu Taiwan 5 77 0.6× 31 0.4× 123 2.1× 31 0.9× 93 3.9× 6 362
A. Oskarsson Sweden 11 263 2.1× 102 1.4× 51 0.9× 11 0.3× 52 2.2× 25 369
D. L. Livesey Canada 10 68 0.5× 60 0.8× 77 1.3× 10 0.3× 23 1.0× 26 196
H. Ozaki Japan 9 69 0.6× 21 0.3× 64 1.1× 22 0.7× 21 0.9× 33 222
J. A. Harvey United States 7 118 1.0× 127 1.8× 80 1.4× 12 0.4× 28 1.2× 15 263
D. Patel India 9 200 1.6× 53 0.7× 92 1.6× 31 0.9× 12 0.5× 29 294

Countries citing papers authored by M. Hüber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Hüber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Hüber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Hüber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Hüber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Hüber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Hüber. The network helps show where M. Hüber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Hüber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Hüber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Hüber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Hüber. M. Hüber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Boer, W. De, et al.. (2002). A GOBAL FIT TO THE ANOMALOUS MAGNETIC MOMENT, HIGGS LIMITS AND b → Xsγ IN THE CONSTRAINED MSSM. arXiv (Cornell University). 196–198. 2 indexed citations
2.
Boer, W. De, et al.. (2001). A global fit to the anomalous magnetic moment, b→Xγ and Higgs limits in the constrained MSSM. Physics Letters B. 515(3-4). 283–290. 22 indexed citations
3.
Boer, W. De, et al.. (2000). The b ---> X(s) gamma decay rate in NLO, Higgs boson limits, and LSP masses in the Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Model. Talk given at. 1086–1087. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gehring, Stefan, Peter Fleischhauer, M. Hüber, et al.. (1996). Magnetic susceptibility studies on the diiron forms of the metalloprotein purple acid phosphate from bovine spleen and kidney bean. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 252(1-2). 13–17. 25 indexed citations
5.
Kniep, Rüdiger, et al.. (1995). Ba5[CrN4]N: Das erste Nitridochromat(V). Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie. 621(4). 511–515. 23 indexed citations
6.
Hüber, M., P. von Neumann–Cosel, A. Richter, et al.. (1993). Structure of intermediate states in the photoexcitation of the 89Y isomer. Nuclear Physics A. 559(2). 253–265. 24 indexed citations
7.
Carroll, J. J., C. B. Collins, K. Heyde, et al.. (1993). Intermediate structure in the photoexcitation ofSem77,Brm79, andBam137. Physical Review C. 48(5). 2238–2245. 25 indexed citations
8.
Collins, C. B., J. J. Carroll, M. Hüber, et al.. (1992). Common thresholds and the role of deformations in the photoexcitation of isomers. Physical Review C. 46(3). 952–960. 19 indexed citations
9.
Carroll, J. J., C. B. Collins, M. Hüber, et al.. (1991). Excitation ofTem123andTem125through (γ,γ’) reactions. Physical Review C. 43(2). 897–900. 11 indexed citations
10.
Collins, C. B., J. J. Carroll, Matthew J. Byrd, et al.. (1990). Resonant excitation of the reactionTam180(γ,γ’)180Ta. Physical Review C. 42(5). R1813–R1816. 58 indexed citations
11.
Ginderow, D. & M. Hüber. (1973). Structure cristalline de C6H12SnSO2 composé d'insertion d'anhydride sulfureux dans une liaison carbone–étain. Acta Crystallographica Section B. 29(3). 560–563. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026