K. Heyde

6.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
183 papers, 4.9k citations indexed

About

K. Heyde is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Heyde has authored 183 papers receiving a total of 4.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 153 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 111 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 42 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in K. Heyde's work include Nuclear physics research studies (146 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (58 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (53 papers). K. Heyde is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (146 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (58 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (53 papers). K. Heyde collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Germany. K. Heyde's co-authors include P. Van Isacker, Michel Waroquier, J. Jolie, C. De Coster, John L. Wood, P. Van Duppen, M. Huyse, J. Ryckebusch, W. Nazarewicz and P.J. Brussaard and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Reports and Journal of Computational Physics.

In The Last Decade

K. Heyde

179 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Hit Papers

Coexistence in even-mass nuclei 1992 2026 2003 2014 1992 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
K. Heyde Belgium 34 4.4k 2.5k 985 914 660 183 4.9k
L. Zamick United States 27 3.4k 0.8× 2.2k 0.9× 672 0.7× 674 0.7× 418 0.6× 244 3.9k
R. F. Casten United States 34 4.8k 1.1× 2.7k 1.1× 849 0.9× 972 1.1× 578 0.9× 177 5.3k
G. Leander United States 35 4.1k 0.9× 2.5k 1.0× 949 1.0× 748 0.8× 662 1.0× 85 4.4k
R. Bengtsson Sweden 34 5.2k 1.2× 2.7k 1.1× 1.2k 1.2× 936 1.0× 850 1.3× 84 5.6k
P. Van Isacker France 37 5.0k 1.1× 2.9k 1.1× 843 0.9× 1.3k 1.5× 508 0.8× 271 5.5k
I. Hamamoto Sweden 39 4.3k 1.0× 2.7k 1.1× 810 0.8× 956 1.0× 661 1.0× 163 4.9k
D. B. Fossan United States 39 5.7k 1.3× 3.1k 1.2× 1.8k 1.8× 897 1.0× 661 1.0× 254 6.1k
F. S. Stephens United States 42 4.7k 1.1× 2.5k 1.0× 1.8k 1.8× 683 0.7× 659 1.0× 160 5.3k
P. M. Walker United Kingdom 36 4.1k 0.9× 2.2k 0.9× 1.1k 1.1× 627 0.7× 702 1.1× 260 4.6k
A. O. Macchiavelli United States 37 5.7k 1.3× 2.8k 1.1× 1.6k 1.7× 649 0.7× 570 0.9× 365 6.0k

Countries citing papers authored by K. Heyde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Heyde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Heyde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Heyde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Heyde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Heyde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Heyde. The network helps show where K. Heyde may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Heyde

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Heyde. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Heyde based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Heyde. K. Heyde is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
García-Ramos, J. E. & K. Heyde. (2015). Disentangling the nuclear shape coexistence in even-even Hg isotopes using the interacting boson model. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 5 indexed citations
2.
Hellemans, V., Stijn De Baerdemacker, & K. Heyde. (2008). Configuration mixing in the neutron-deficientPb186196isotopes. Physical Review C. 77(6). 18 indexed citations
3.
Fossión, Rubén, V. Hellemans, Stijn De Baerdemacker, & K. Heyde. (2005). Shape Coexistence in the Lead Isotopes Using Algebraic Models: Description of Spectroscopic and Ground-State Related Properties. Acta Physica Polonica B. 36(4). 1351–1354.
4.
Jachowicz, N., et al.. (2004). Identifying Neutrinos and Antineutrinos in Neutral-Current ScatteringReactions. Physical Review Letters. 93(8). 82501–82501. 29 indexed citations
5.
Coster, C. De, et al.. (2000). Evidence for proton four-particle-four-hole intruder excitations in neutron deficient nuclei in the Pb region - art. no. 067306.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).
6.
Jachowicz, N., S. Rombouts, K. Heyde, & J. Ryckebusch. (1999). Cross sections for neutral-current neutrino-nucleus interactions: Applications for12Cand16O. Physical Review C. 59(6). 3246–3255. 42 indexed citations
7.
Beule, Joachim De, et al.. (1998). Particle-hole excitations in the interacting boson models IBM-2 and IBM-3. Physical Review C. 57(5). 2329–2341. 9 indexed citations
8.
Rombouts, S., K. Heyde, & N. Jachowicz. (1998). Thermodynamical properties of a mean-field plus pairing model and applications for the Fe nuclei. Physical Review C. 58(6). 3295–3304. 30 indexed citations
9.
Heyde, K., C. De Coster, S. Rombouts, & S. J. Freeman. (1996). A schematic model for the study of fragmentation of scissors M1 strength in deformed nuclei. Nuclear Physics A. 596(1). 30–52. 12 indexed citations
10.
Heyde, K. & C. De Coster. (1991). Correlation betweenE2 andM1 transition strength in even-even vibrational, transitional, and deformed nuclei. Physical Review C. 44(6). R2262–R2266. 34 indexed citations
11.
Coster, C. De & K. Heyde. (1989). THE F-SPIN STRUCTURE OF THE NEUTRON-PROTON INTERACTING BOSON MODEL: HAMILTONIAN AND ELECTROMAGNETIC OPERATORS. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 4(14). 3665–3688. 14 indexed citations
12.
Ryckebusch, J., K. Heyde, Dimitri Van Neck, & Michel Waroquier. (1989). Aspects of the final-state interaction and long-range correlations in quasi-elastic (e, e′p) and (e, e′n) reactions. Nuclear Physics A. 503(3-4). 694–722. 27 indexed citations
13.
Reiner, Knut, P. Grabmayr, G. Mertens, et al.. (1989). (e, e' p) study of the continuum of 58Ni above the giant resonance re. Physics Letters B. 228(1). 31–36. 4 indexed citations
14.
Huyse, M., et al.. (1988). Intruder states in odd-odd Tl nuclei: The completion of a unique set of intruder systematics. Physics Letters B. 201(3). 293–296. 28 indexed citations
15.
Heyde, K., J. Jolie, Jean Charles Moreau, et al.. (1986). A new prescription for determining particle-hole interactions near closed shells. Physics Letters B. 176(3-4). 255–259. 12 indexed citations
16.
Jolie, J., P. Van Isacker, K. Heyde, et al.. (1985). Multilevel description of the Rh isotopes in the interacting boson-fermion model. Nuclear Physics A. 438(1). 15–28. 24 indexed citations
17.
Schölten, O., A.E.L. Dieperink, K. Heyde, & P. Van Isacker. (1984). M3 transitions in the interacting boson model. Physics Letters B. 149(4-5). 279–282. 22 indexed citations
18.
Heyde, K., P. Van Isacker, Michel Waroquier, & Jean Charles Moreau. (1984). Triaxial shapes in the interacting boson model. Physical Review C. 29(4). 1420–1427. 106 indexed citations
19.
Gelder, P. De, D. De Frenne, E. Jacobs, et al.. (1980). The β− decay of 102Mo. Nuclear Physics A. 337(2). 285–300. 4 indexed citations
20.
Berrier-Ronsin, G., Guillaume Duhamel, E. Gerlic, et al.. (1977). The 116Sn(d, t)115Sn reaction at 23 MeV. Nuclear Physics A. 288(2). 279–290. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026