Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
TOWARD THE STANDARD POPULATION SYNTHESIS MODEL OF THE X-RAY BACKGROUND: EVOLUTION OF X-RAY LUMINOSITY AND ABSORPTION FUNCTIONS OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI INCLUDING COMPTON-THICK POPULATIONS
2014378 citationsYoshihiro Ueda, M. G. Watson et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. G. Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. G. Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. G. Watson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. G. Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. G. Watson. The network helps show where M. G. Watson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. G. Watson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. G. Watson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. G. Watson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. G. Watson. M. G. Watson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mateos, S., F. J. Carrera, A. Alonso‐Herrero, et al.. (2016). X-RAY ABSORPTION, NUCLEAR INFRARED EMISSION, AND DUST COVERING FACTORS OF AGNs: TESTING UNIFICATION SCHEMES. Figshare.33 indexed citations
Esquej, P., M. J. Page, F. J. Carrera, et al.. (2014). The XMM-Newton Wide Angle Survey (XWAS). LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).5 indexed citations
González-Martín, O., I. E. Papadakis, V. Braito, et al.. (2011). Suzakuobservation of the LINER NGC 4102. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 527. A142–A142.13 indexed citations
Hands, Alex, R. S. Warwick, M. G. Watson, & D. J. Helfand. (2009). X-ray source populations in the Galactic plane. Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester).23 indexed citations
Carrera, F. J., J. Ebrero, S. Mateos, et al.. (2007). The XMM-Newton serendipitous survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 469(1). 27–46.44 indexed citations
Sansom, A. E., M. G. Watson, Kazuo Makishima, & Tadayasu Dotani. (1989). GINGA observations of 4U 1820-30 in NGC 6624 : the 11-minute flux modulation.. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. 41(3). 591–605.1 indexed citations
18.
Koyama, K., F. Nagase, Y. Ogawara, et al.. (1989). GINGA observation of the X-ray pulsar 1E 2259+586 in the supernova remnant G 109.1-1.0. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. 41(3). 461–471.4 indexed citations
19.
Smale, A. P., K. O. Mason, O. R. Williams, & M. G. Watson. (1989). Ginga observations of the dipping X-ray binary XB 1916-053. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. 41(3). 607–615.1 indexed citations
20.
Watson, M. G., A. R. King, & Gwyneth Williams. (1987). X-ray and optical flickering in EF Eri. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 226(4). 867–878.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.