M. Field

4.4k citations
65 papers · 3.5k indexed · h-index 36

M. Field

63 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

M. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Geophysics 1.4k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 558
  • Paleontology 371
  • Atmospheric Science 749
  • Oceanography 466
Replace Don Porcelli with:
Don Porcelli United Kingdom
Jacques Boulègue France
Chen‐Feng You Taiwan
Joseph A. Resing United States
Masaharu Tanimizu Japan
Wafa Abouchami Germany
Martin B. Goldhaber United States
Nadine Mattielli Belgium
Johan C. Varekamp United States
Franco Tassi Italy
M. Field relative to Don Porcelli United Kingdom Don Porcelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Don Porcelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Field. The network helps show where M. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Field Line = papers co-authored together M. Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202321
2 202036
3 201628
4
Automated Sample Preparation for Radiogenic and Non-Traditional Metal Isotopes: Removing an Analytical Barrier for High Sample Throughput
20141
5 201338
6 201358
7
Automated sample preparation for radiogenic and non-traditional metal isotope analysis by MC-ICP-MS
20122
8 201217
9 201235
10
The Geochemistry of the Snap Lake kimberlite dyke, NW Territories, Canada: Phlogopite and Spinel
20093
11
Volatiles in Kimberlite Magmas: Experimental Constraints
20092
12 200842
13 200815
14 200836
15 200758
16 200755
17 200738
18 2006127
19 200453
20 200330

About M. Field

M. Field is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology and Paleontology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (25 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (15 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (11 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (8 papers), Heavy metals in environment (7 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (7 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (7 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (1.4k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (558 citations) and Paleontology (371 citations). M. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Robert M. Sherrell, R. S. J. Sparks, Yair Rosenthal, John C. Schumacher, Rosemary Brown, Sue A. Shapses, Jay T. Cullen, Thomas Gernon, Yuan Gao and A Walters. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Lithos, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Bulletin of Volcanology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026