David H. Ellison
- Molecular Biology top 0.5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 0.2%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 0.1%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 0.5%
- Nephrology top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- James A. McCormickChao-Ling YangHeino VelázquezTomás BerlFay WrightArohan R. SubramanyaRobert F. ReillyAndrew S. Terker
- Topics
- Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (128 papers)Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (57 papers)Magnesium in Health and Disease (37 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
David H. Ellison
217 papers receiving 12.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Molecular Biology 8.2k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 4.9k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 2.7k
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 2.4k
- Nephrology 2.1k
Countries citing papers authored by David H. Ellison
This map shows the geographic impact of David H. Ellison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David H. Ellison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David H. Ellison more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David H. Ellison
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David H. Ellison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David H. Ellison. The network helps show where David H. Ellison may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David H. Ellison
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David H. Ellison. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David H. Ellison based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David H. Ellison. David H. Ellison is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 160 | |
| 18 | 139 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 351 |
About David H. Ellison
David H. Ellison is a scholar working on Nephrology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 226 papers that have together received 12.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (128 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (57 papers) and Magnesium in Health and Disease (37 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (2.1k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (2.7k citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (4.9k citations). David H. Ellison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James A. McCormick, Chao-Ling Yang, Heino Velázquez, Tomás Berl, Fay Wright, Arohan R. Subramanya, Robert F. Reilly, Andrew S. Terker, G. Michael Felker and Gerardo Gamba. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.