M. Estrella Santamaría
- Plant Science top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Isabel Dı́azManuel MartínezVojislava GrbićPablo González‐MelendiAna ArnáizMercedes Díaz‐MendozaMaría Jesús CañalInés Cambra
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (27 papers)Insect Resistance and Genetics (16 papers)Plant Parasitism and Resistance (13 papers)
In The Last Decade
M. Estrella Santamaría
63 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Plant Science 1.4k
- Molecular Biology 998
- Insect Science 649
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 153
- Biotechnology 93
Countries citing papers authored by M. Estrella Santamaría
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Estrella Santamaría's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Estrella Santamaría with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Estrella Santamaría more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Estrella Santamaría
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Estrella Santamaría. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Estrella Santamaría. The network helps show where M. Estrella Santamaría may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Estrella Santamaría
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Estrella Santamaría. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Estrella Santamaría based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Estrella Santamaría. M. Estrella Santamaría is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 65 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | Dynamics of DNA Methylation during Castanea sativa Mill. Development, Maturation and Reinvigoration Process. Application to Breeding Programs. | 1 |
About M. Estrella Santamaría
M. Estrella Santamaría is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Endocrinology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (27 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (16 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (649 citations), Plant Science (1.4k citations) and Horticulture (15 citations). M. Estrella Santamaría has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Isabel Dı́az, Manuel Martínez, Vojislava Grbić, Pablo González‐Melendi, Ana Arnáiz, Mercedes Díaz‐Mendoza, María Jesús Cañal, Inés Cambra, Luís Valledor and Félix Ortego. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.