M. David Checkel

1.7k total citations
68 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

M. David Checkel is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, M. David Checkel has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, 33 papers in Computational Mechanics and 20 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in M. David Checkel's work include Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (36 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (30 papers) and Vehicle emissions and performance (20 papers). M. David Checkel is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (36 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (30 papers) and Vehicle emissions and performance (20 papers). M. David Checkel collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Iran. M. David Checkel's co-authors include J. D. Dale, David S.‐K. Ting, Vahid Hosseini, Rahim Khoshbakhti Saray, Robert E. Hayes, Rui Liu, Brian A. Fleck, Peter C. Flynn, Minzhang Zheng and Emad Ghafoori and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Energy, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy and Atmospheric Environment.

In The Last Decade

M. David Checkel

68 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. David Checkel Canada 23 918 730 529 296 264 68 1.4k
William F. Northrop United States 21 920 1.0× 441 0.6× 596 1.1× 481 1.6× 115 0.4× 129 1.5k
Leonid Tartakovsky Israel 23 897 1.0× 502 0.7× 465 0.9× 520 1.8× 184 0.7× 65 1.5k
Pedro Piqueras Spain 23 732 0.8× 284 0.4× 788 1.5× 579 2.0× 319 1.2× 89 1.4k
Patrik Soltic Switzerland 23 832 0.9× 421 0.6× 825 1.6× 200 0.7× 200 0.8× 74 1.6k
Xinqi Qiao China 22 891 1.0× 803 1.1× 307 0.6× 352 1.2× 248 0.9× 108 1.7k
Amin Paykani Iran 20 1.1k 1.2× 602 0.8× 622 1.2× 395 1.3× 148 0.6× 51 1.5k
Wenbin Yu Singapore 29 1.6k 1.8× 1.0k 1.4× 572 1.1× 581 2.0× 275 1.0× 103 2.1k
Vicente Bermúdez Spain 22 1.3k 1.5× 662 0.9× 976 1.8× 412 1.4× 293 1.1× 69 2.0k
Feiyang Zhao Singapore 21 725 0.8× 434 0.6× 260 0.5× 310 1.0× 119 0.5× 44 1.1k
Robert R. Raine New Zealand 23 1.1k 1.2× 647 0.9× 534 1.0× 224 0.8× 184 0.7× 64 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by M. David Checkel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. David Checkel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. David Checkel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. David Checkel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. David Checkel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. David Checkel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. David Checkel. The network helps show where M. David Checkel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. David Checkel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. David Checkel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. David Checkel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. David Checkel. M. David Checkel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Olfert, Jason S., et al.. (2013). Effect of fuel choice on nanoparticle emission factors in LPG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Technology. 14(1). 1–11. 7 indexed citations
2.
Saray, Rahim Khoshbakhti, et al.. (2010). Detailed approach for apparent heat release analysis in HCCI engines. Fuel. 89(9). 2323–2330. 47 indexed citations
3.
Checkel, M. David, et al.. (2009). Extending the Load Range of a Natural Gas HCCI Engine using Direct Injected Pilot Charge and External EGR. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 17 indexed citations
4.
Hosseini, Vahid, W. Stuart Neill, & M. David Checkel. (2008). Controlling n-Heptane HCCI Combustion With Partial Reforming: Experimental Results and Modeling Analysis. 1–14. 3 indexed citations
5.
Checkel, M. David, et al.. (2008). Environmental, Thermodynamic and Chemical Factor Effectson Heptane- and CNG-fuelled HCCI Combustion with VariousMixture Compositions. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 3 indexed citations
6.
Olfert, Jason S. & M. David Checkel. (2007). An ultrasonic sound speed sensor for measuring exhaust gas recirculation levels. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering. 221(2). 181–189. 1 indexed citations
7.
Mmbaga, Joseph P., et al.. (2007). Heat and mass transfer limitations in pre-turbocharger catalysts. Topics in Catalysis. 42-43(1-4). 429–432. 11 indexed citations
8.
Hosseini, Vahid & M. David Checkel. (2007). Effect of Reformer Gas on HCCI Combustion - Part I:High Octane Fuels. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 19 indexed citations
9.
Checkel, M. David, et al.. (2006). CALMOB6: A Fuel Economy and Emissions Tool for Transportation Planners. 2 indexed citations
10.
Checkel, M. David, et al.. (2006). Hydrogen from reformer gas a novel fuel and bridging technology: A combustion perspective. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 32(10-11). 1416–1420. 3 indexed citations
11.
Checkel, M. David, et al.. (2005). A Stand-Alone Multi-Zone Model for Combustion in HCCI Engines. 265–274. 16 indexed citations
12.
Hosseini, Vahid & M. David Checkel. (2005). Alternate Modes Combustion Study: HCCI Fueled With Heptane and Spark Ignition Fueled With Reformer Gas. 253–264. 6 indexed citations
13.
Olfert, Jason S. & M. David Checkel. (2005). A Fuel Quality Sensor for Fuel Cell Vehicles, Natural Gas Vehicles, and Variable Gaseous Fuel Vehicles. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 1 indexed citations
14.
Moussa, Walied A., et al.. (2004). Finite element modeling of a capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer. 405–410. 7 indexed citations
15.
Checkel, M. David, et al.. (1998). Uncertainty, Sensitivity and Data Quality Assessment for Life Cycle Value Assessment (LCVA). SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 4 indexed citations
16.
Ting, David S.‐K., et al.. (1994). Early Flame Acceleration Measurements in a Turbulent Spark-Ignited Mixture. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 19 indexed citations
17.
Ashurst, W. T., M. David Checkel, & David S.‐K. Ting. (1994). The Eddy Structure Model of Turbulent Flamelet Propagation, the Expanding Spherical and Steady Planar Cases. Combustion Science and Technology. 99(1-3). 51–74. 14 indexed citations
18.
Checkel, M. David, et al.. (1993). Performance and Emissions of a Converted RABA 2356 Bus Engine in Diesel and Dual Fuel Diesel/Natural Gas Operation. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 4 indexed citations
19.
Checkel, M. David & David S.‐K. Ting. (1992). Measuring Turbulent Flame Growth by Visualization. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 9 indexed citations
20.
Checkel, M. David & J. D. Dale. (1989). Pressure Trace Knock Measurement in a Current S.I. Production Engine. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026