Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Estimate ofB(B¯→Xsγ)atO(αs2)
2007428 citationsMikołaj Misiak, H. M. Asatrian et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders ThroughO(αS4)
2013390 citationsM. Czakon, Paul Fiedler et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Updated Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Predictions for the Weak Radiative B-Meson Decays
2015252 citationsMikołaj Misiak, H. M. Asatrian et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Czakon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Czakon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Czakon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Czakon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Czakon. The network helps show where M. Czakon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Czakon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Czakon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Czakon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Czakon. M. Czakon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Czakon, M., Alexander Mitov, & René Poncelet. (2023). Infrared-safe flavoured anti-kT jets. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023(4).28 indexed citations
Czakon, M., Paul Fiedler, & Alexander Mitov. (2014). Resolving the Tevatron top quark forward-backward asymmetry puzzle. arXiv (Cornell University).7 indexed citations
13.
Czakon, M., Paul Fiedler, & Alexander Mitov. (2013). Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders ThroughO(αS4). Physical Review Letters. 110(25). 252004–252004.390 indexed citations breakdown →
Czakon, M., C.G. Papadopoulos, & Małgorzata Worek. (2009). Polarizing the dipoles. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2009(8). 85–85.89 indexed citations
17.
Misiak, Mikołaj, H. M. Asatrian, K. Bieri, et al.. (2007). Estimate ofB(B¯→Xsγ)atO(αs2). Physical Review Letters. 98(2). 22002–22002.428 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Boughezal, Radja, M. Czakon, & Thomas Schutzmeier. (2006). Four-Loop Tadpoles: Applications in QCD.24 indexed citations
19.
Awramik, M., M. Czakon, A. Freitas, & G. Weiglein. (2004). Towards better constraints on the Higgs boson mass: Two-loop fermionic corrections to $\sin^{2}\theta^{\rm lept}_{\rm eff}$. Talk given at.1 indexed citations
20.
Czakon, M., J. Gluza, & M. Zrałek. (2001). Nonunitary neutrino mixing matrix and CP violating neutrino oscillations. Acta Physica Polonica B. 32(11). 3735–3744.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.