M. Clavel

1.7k total citations
56 papers, 877 citations indexed

About

M. Clavel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Clavel has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 877 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 26 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 7 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in M. Clavel's work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (46 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (30 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (25 papers). M. Clavel is often cited by papers focused on Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (46 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (30 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (25 papers). M. Clavel collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. M. Clavel's co-authors include G. Ponti, M. Morris, R. Terrier, Jonathan Ferreira, Pierre-Olivier Petrucci, John A. Tomsick, J. Malzac, R. Bélmont, M. Coriat and S. Corbel and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

M. Clavel

49 papers receiving 821 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Clavel France 17 845 354 133 102 34 56 877
D. J. K. Buisson United Kingdom 17 885 1.0× 353 1.0× 136 1.0× 76 0.7× 20 0.6× 51 907
Vikram Rana United States 16 833 1.0× 251 0.7× 100 0.8× 180 1.8× 27 0.8× 52 866
W. Eikmann United States 5 944 1.1× 339 1.0× 170 1.3× 104 1.0× 37 1.1× 9 958
F. Fuerst United States 18 738 0.9× 250 0.7× 98 0.7× 96 0.9× 28 0.8× 46 752
Jin‐Lu Qu China 17 915 1.1× 344 1.0× 120 0.9× 189 1.9× 17 0.5× 111 946
Sachindra Naik India 16 715 0.8× 237 0.7× 60 0.5× 167 1.6× 11 0.3× 86 755
Jeanette C. Gladstone Canada 14 874 1.0× 294 0.8× 114 0.9× 83 0.8× 25 0.7× 20 885
A. Goldwurm France 17 818 1.0× 402 1.1× 82 0.6× 104 1.0× 43 1.3× 46 858
Joey Neilsen United States 21 1.4k 1.6× 548 1.5× 230 1.7× 161 1.6× 23 0.7× 48 1.4k
Hannah P. Earnshaw United States 14 551 0.7× 162 0.5× 78 0.6× 111 1.1× 25 0.7× 35 582

Countries citing papers authored by M. Clavel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Clavel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Clavel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Clavel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Clavel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Clavel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Clavel. The network helps show where M. Clavel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Clavel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Clavel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Clavel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Clavel. M. Clavel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dai, Shi, Qi‐Jun Zhi, Francesca Calore, et al.. (2025). Discovery of 15 New Pulsars at High Galactic Latitudes with FAST. The Astrophysical Journal. 982(2). 117–117.
2.
Kervella, P., P. Panuzzo, A. Gallenne, et al.. (2025). VLTI/GRAVITY upper limit on near-infrared emission from the nearby 33 M⊙ black hole Gaia BH3. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 695. L1–L1.
3.
Svoboda, Jiří, A. Zezas, Peter Boorman, et al.. (2024). X-ray observations of Blueberry galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 691. A27–A27. 2 indexed citations
4.
Eckner, Christopher, et al.. (2024). Simulation-based Inference of Radio Millisecond Pulsars in Globular Clusters. The Astrophysical Journal. 974(1). 144–144. 3 indexed citations
5.
Calore, Francesca, M. Clavel, Joshua Marvil, et al.. (2024). Multiwavelength identification of millisecond pulsar candidates in the Galactic bulge. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 690. A330–A330.
6.
Gerber, J., Jeremy Hare, John A. Tomsick, et al.. (2024). X-ray measurement of a high-mass white dwarf and its spin for the intermediate polar IGR J18434−0508. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 530(1). 861–869. 1 indexed citations
7.
Frail, D. A., Emil Polisensky, Scott D. Hyman, et al.. (2024). An Image-based Search for Pulsar Candidates in the MeerKAT Bulge Survey. The Astrophysical Journal. 975(1). 34–34. 3 indexed citations
8.
Tomsick, John A., A. W. Shaw, K. Mukai, et al.. (2023). Classifying IGR J15038−6021 as a magnetic CV with a massive white dwarf. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 523(3). 4520–4533. 2 indexed citations
9.
Tomsick, John A., A. W. Shaw, K. Mukai, et al.. (2022). Classifying IGR J18007−4146 as an intermediate polar using XMM and NuSTAR. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 511(3). 4582–4589. 6 indexed citations
10.
Rogers, F., et al.. (2022). New Constraints on Cosmic Particle Populations at the Galactic Center Using X-Ray Observations of the Molecular Cloud Sagittarius B2. The Astrophysical Journal. 934(1). 19–19. 6 indexed citations
11.
Ferreira, Jonathan, P-O Petrucci, J. Malzac, et al.. (2022). A unified accretion-ejection paradigm for black hole X-ray binaries. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 659. A194–A194. 14 indexed citations
12.
Zhang, Shuo, Hui Li, Dheeraj R. Pasham, et al.. (2020). NuSTAR and Chandra Observations of the Galactic Center Nonthermal X-Ray Filament G0.13–0.11: A Pulsar-wind-nebula-driven Magnetic Filament. The Astrophysical Journal. 893(1). 3–3. 12 indexed citations
13.
Cangemi, F., Juan Rodríguez, Joey Neilsen, et al.. (2020). A unified accretion-ejection paradigm for black hole X-ray binaries. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 640. A18–A18. 21 indexed citations
14.
Кузнецова, Е. А., Roman Krivonos, M. Clavel, et al.. (2019). Investigating the origin of the faint non-thermal emission of the Arches cluster using the 2015–2016NuSTARandXMM–NewtonX-ray observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 484(2). 1627–1636. 7 indexed citations
15.
Cangemi, F., et al.. (2019). Reduction of the rate of flux increase during recent INTEGRAL hard state observations of the new transient black hole candidate MAXI J1348-630. ATel. 12457. 1. 1 indexed citations
16.
Hofmann, F., G. Ponti, F. Haberl, & M. Clavel. (2018). New transient Galactic bulge intermediate polar candidate XMMU J175035.2-293557. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 615. L7–L7. 4 indexed citations
17.
Zhang, Shuo, Frederick K. Baganoff, G. Ponti, et al.. (2017). Sagittarius A* High-energy X-Ray Flare Properties during NuStar Monitoring of the Galactic Center from 2012 to 2015. The Astrophysical Journal. 843(2). 96–96. 15 indexed citations
18.
Clavel, M., John A. Tomsick, Farid Rahoui, & Roman Krivonos. (2016). Identifying IGR J18293-1213 and IGR J14091-6108 as magnetic CVs. 41. 1 indexed citations
19.
Ponti, G., S. Bianchi, T. Muñoz‐Darias, et al.. (2014). On the Fe K absorption – accretion state connection in the Galactic Centre neutron star X-ray binary AX J1745.6-2901. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 446(2). 1536–1550. 32 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. J. K. Buisson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vikram Rana Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by W. Eikmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by F. Fuerst Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jin‐Lu Qu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sachindra Naik Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeanette C. Gladstone Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Goldwurm Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joey Neilsen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hannah P. Earnshaw
Rankless by CCL
2026