Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
IBIS: The Imager on-board INTEGRAL
2003602 citationsP. Ubertini, F. Lebrun et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Goldwurm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Goldwurm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Goldwurm more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Goldwurm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Goldwurm. The network helps show where A. Goldwurm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Goldwurm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Goldwurm.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Goldwurm based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. Goldwurm. A. Goldwurm is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Prat, L., Juan Rodríguez, M. Cadolle Bel, et al.. (2009). Renewed activity from IGR J17098-3628 detected by INTEGRAL/IBIS. The astronomer's telegram. 2003. 1.1 indexed citations
3.
Falanga, M., S. Soldi, S. E. Shaw, et al.. (2007). INTEGRAL IBIS/ISGRI hard X-ray detection of the accreting millisecond pulsar XTE J1751-305. ATel. 1046. 1.
4.
Bel, M. Cadolle, Juan Rodríguez, A. Goldwurm, et al.. (2005). INTEGRAL High-Energy Detection of SWIFT J1753.5-0127. ATel. 574. 1.2 indexed citations
Goldoni, P., A. Goldwurm, F. Lebrun, et al.. (1999). Deep Sigma Observations of the Central Square Degree of the Galaxy. CERN Bulletin. 38. 305.2 indexed citations
15.
Trudolyubov, S., M. Gilfanov, E. Churazov, et al.. (1996). SIGMA/GRANAT observations of the X-ray transient KS/GRS 1730-312 in Scorpius. 22(5). 664–671.2 indexed citations
16.
Roques, J. P., D. Barret, F. Lei, et al.. (1993). Discovery of the high energy emission from the transient X-ray pulsar GRS 0834-430. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 97(1). 333–334.1 indexed citations
17.
Gilfanov, M., E. Churazov, R. Sunyaev, et al.. (1993). The spectra of Nova Muscae 1991 between 3 keV and 1 MeV observed with GRANAT. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 97(1). 303–307.1 indexed citations
18.
Gilfanov, M., R. Sunyaev, E. Churazov, et al.. (1993). Hard X-ray observations of the binary system 4U 1700-377/HD 153919 with the SIGMA Telescope on board GRANAT.. Astronomy Letters. 19. 188.
19.
Finoguenov, A., M. Gilfanov, С. А. Гребенев, et al.. (1993). Hard X-ray observations of the LMC field with SIGMA telescope on board "Granat". Upper limits on the flux from SN 1987A.. Astronomy Letters. 19. 69.1 indexed citations
20.
Bignami, G. F., P. A. Caraveo, S. Mereghetti, et al.. (1991). Optical identification of celestial high energy sources.. Msngr. 66. 10–13.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.