M. C. de Rijk
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Monique M.B. BretelerAlbert HofmanWalter A. RoccaChristophe TzourioL. AmaducciSecundino López‐PousaAnnick AlpérovitchJ.-F. Dartigues
- Topics
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers)Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsArgentinaNepal
In The Last Decade
M. C. de Rijk
11 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Neurology 1.7k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 568
- Physiology 367
- Molecular Biology 309
- Neurology 300
Countries citing papers authored by M. C. de Rijk
This map shows the geographic impact of M. C. de Rijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. C. de Rijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. C. de Rijk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. C. de Rijk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. C. de Rijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. C. de Rijk. The network helps show where M. C. de Rijk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. C. de Rijk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. C. de Rijk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. C. de Rijk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. C. de Rijk. M. C. de Rijk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 119 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 284 | |
| 5 | 79 | |
| 6 | Prevalence of Parkinson's disease in Europe : A collaborative study of population-based cohorts | 380 |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 174 | |
| 9 | 177 | |
| 10 | Prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson's disease in Europe: the EUROPARKINSON Collaborative Study. European Community Concerted Action on the Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease.breakdown → | 630 |
| 11 | 373 |
About M. C. de Rijk
M. C. de Rijk is a scholar working on Neurology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Neurology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.7k citations), Neurology (300 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (568 citations). M. C. de Rijk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Argentina and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Monique M.B. Breteler, Albert Hofman, Walter A. Rocca, Christophe Tzourio, L. Amaducci, Secundino López‐Pousa, Annick Alpérovitch, J.-F. Dartigues, D. E. Grobbee and Alewijn Ott. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Neurology and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.