Lynne M. Murphy
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Timothy O. LipmanSokichi ManiwaTomoo TakahashiYasuo SakaiTakeshi TaketaniYuichi MushimotoHironori KobayashiYuki Hasegawa
- Topics
- Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (4 papers)Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers)Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanIndia
In The Last Decade
Lynne M. Murphy
10 papers receiving 215 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Nutrition and Dietetics 113
- Psychiatry and Mental health 88
- Speech and Hearing 60
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 56
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Lynne M. Murphy
This map shows the geographic impact of Lynne M. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynne M. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynne M. Murphy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lynne M. Murphy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynne M. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynne M. Murphy. The network helps show where Lynne M. Murphy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lynne M. Murphy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lynne M. Murphy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lynne M. Murphy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lynne M. Murphy. Lynne M. Murphy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | The Prodigal Tongue: The Love-Hate Relationship Between American and British English | 7 |
| 4 | The Prodigal Tongue: The Love-Hate Relationship Between British and American English | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 151 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 46 |
About Lynne M. Murphy
Lynne M. Murphy is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Speech and Hearing, having authored 10 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (4 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (60 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (113 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (88 citations). Lynne M. Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and India. Frequent co-authors include Timothy O. Lipman, Sokichi Maniwa, Tomoo Takahashi, Yasuo Sakai, Takeshi Taketani, Yuichi Mushimoto, Hironori Kobayashi, Yuki Hasegawa, Riruke Maruyama and Noriyoshi Ishikawa. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Brain and Language and Nutrition in Clinical Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.