Luma Al-Attar
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Rodolfo A. ReyCorinne BelvillePaul S. BurgoyneMaguelone G. ForestN JossoMartin DutertreClaire Nihoul‐FeketéP. Barbet
- Topics
- Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers)Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical InvestigationAmerican Journal of OphthalmologyInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Luma Al-Attar
10 papers receiving 413 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Reproductive Medicine 195
- Molecular Biology 177
- Genetics 151
- Ophthalmology 133
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 117
Countries citing papers authored by Luma Al-Attar
This map shows the geographic impact of Luma Al-Attar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luma Al-Attar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luma Al-Attar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luma Al-Attar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luma Al-Attar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luma Al-Attar. The network helps show where Luma Al-Attar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luma Al-Attar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luma Al-Attar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luma Al-Attar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luma Al-Attar. Luma Al-Attar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Comparison of Foldable Versus Nonfoldable Intraocular Lenses in Conjunction with Pars Plana Vitrectomy | 1 |
| 9 | 194 | |
| 10 | Testicular dysgenesis does not affect expression of anti-müllerian hormone by Sertoli cells in premeiotic seminiferous tubules. | 77 |
About Luma Al-Attar
Luma Al-Attar is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Reproductive Medicine and Neurology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (195 citations), Ophthalmology (133 citations) and Genetics (151 citations). Luma Al-Attar has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Rodolfo A. Rey, Corinne Belville, Paul S. Burgoyne, Maguelone G. Forest, N Josso, Martin Dutertre, Claire Nihoul‐Feketé, P. Barbet, Francis Jaubert and Janet L. Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.