Luke Ambrose
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Genetics
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Nigel W. BeebeRobert D. CooperNorton G. MillerDaniel Ortíz-BarrientosNeil F. LoboAndrew F. van den HurkGreg M. WalterPeter J. Prentis
- Topics
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control (10 papers)Malaria Research and Control (10 papers)Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect SciencePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Luke Ambrose
16 papers receiving 327 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 193
- Insect Science 91
- Genetics 84
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 78
- Plant Science 72
Countries citing papers authored by Luke Ambrose
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Ambrose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Ambrose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Ambrose more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Ambrose
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Ambrose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Ambrose. The network helps show where Luke Ambrose may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Ambrose
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Ambrose. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Ambrose based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Ambrose. Luke Ambrose is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 74 | |
| 14 | 87 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 29 |
About Luke Ambrose
Luke Ambrose is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Insect Science and Parasitology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (10 papers), Malaria Research and Control (10 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (91 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (193 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (78 citations). Luke Ambrose has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Nigel W. Beebe, Robert D. Cooper, Norton G. Miller, Daniel Ortíz-Barrientos, Neil F. Lobo, Andrew F. van den Hurk, Greg M. Walter, Peter J. Prentis, Andrew J. Lowe and Lisa J. Reimer. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Ecology, Heredity and PLoS neglected tropical diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.