James Hereward

919 citations
64 papers · 603 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James Hereward

59 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

James Hereward
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Insect Science 389
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 204
  • Plant Science 309
  • Horticulture 4
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 47
Replace S. Kristine Braman with:
S. Kristine Braman United States
Pedro Henrique Brum Togni Brazil
Meng Ling China
Anjel M. Helms United States
Todd A. Ugine United States
Ya‐Jun Gong China
Rose Ndemah Cameroon
PW Walker Australia
Evôneo Berti Filho Brazil
Martine Kos Netherlands
James Hereward relative to S. Kristine Braman United States S. Kristine Braman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
S. Kristine Braman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Hereward

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Hereward's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hereward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hereward more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Hereward

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hereward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hereward. The network helps show where James Hereward may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Hereward, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Hereward Line = papers co-authored together James Hereward links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201196
2 201666
3 201230
4 201427
5 202026
6 201324
7 201523
8 201722
9 201320
10 201816
11 202115
12 202115
13 201713
14 201911
15 201311
16 201311
17 201810
18 20229
19 20179
20 20248

About James Hereward

James Hereward is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 64 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (25 papers), Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (10 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (10 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers) and Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (389 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (204 citations), Plant Science (309 citations), Horticulture (4 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (47 citations). James Hereward has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Gimme H. Walter, Gregory J. Daglish, A. W. Ridley, S. Raghu, Graham A. McCulloch, Patrick J. Collins, Michael J. Furlong, Paul J. De Barro, Rehan Silva and David Thornby. Their work appears in journals such as Pest Management Science, Bulletin of Entomological Research, Evolutionary Applications, Journal of Economic Entomology and Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact