Lukas J. Wolf

977 total citations
28 papers, 625 citations indexed

About

Lukas J. Wolf is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Lukas J. Wolf has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 625 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Social Psychology, 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Lukas J. Wolf's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (17 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (15 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). Lukas J. Wolf is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (17 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (15 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). Lukas J. Wolf collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Lukas J. Wolf's co-authors include Paul H. P. Hanel, Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, Gregory R. Maio, Geoffrey Haddock, Netta Weinstein, Antony S. R. Manstead, Andrew Balmford, Sophus zu Ermgassen, Mathew P. White and Uwe Wolfradt and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Lukas J. Wolf

25 papers receiving 613 citations

Peers

Lukas J. Wolf

SPS

Kátia Correa Vione United Kingdom

Ryan J. Gagnon United States

Erica Molinario United States

Francesca Romana Alparone Italy

Matt N Williams New Zealand

Stylianos Syropoulos United States

Charlie R. Crimston Australia

Joonha Park Japan

Tomasz Besta Poland

Kátia Correa Vione United Kingdom

Lukas J. Wolf

231 ×0.8

SPS

305 ×1.3

91 ×1.0

77 ×0.9

167 ×2.1

Citations per year, relative to Lukas J. Wolf Lukas J. Wolf (= 1×) peers Kátia Correa Vione

Countries citing papers authored by Lukas J. Wolf

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lukas J. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukas J. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukas J. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lukas J. Wolf

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukas J. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukas J. Wolf. The network helps show where Lukas J. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lukas J. Wolf

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lukas J. Wolf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lukas J. Wolf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lukas J. Wolf. Lukas J. Wolf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Martín-Ortega, Julia, Lukas J. Wolf, Emmanouil Tyllianakis, et al.. (2024). Transforming the food system: Are farmers ready to take phosphorus stewardship action?. Environmental Science & Policy. 162. 103930–103930. 1 indexed citations

Wolf, Lukas J. & Paul H. P. Hanel. (2024). Correcting Misperceptions of Fundamental Differences Between U.S. Republicans and Democrats: Some Hope-Inspiring Effects. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 15(8). 895–907. 3 indexed citations

Schulz, Christopher, et al.. (2024). Valuing water: A global survey of the values that underpin water decisions. Environmental Science & Policy. 153. 103685–103685. 8 indexed citations

Coelho, Gabriel Lins de Holanda, Lukas J. Wolf, Roosevelt Vilar, Renan Pereira Monteiro, & Paul H. P. Hanel. (2023). Do left-wingers discriminate? A cross-country study on the links between political orientation, values, moral foundations, and the Covid-19 passport. Current Psychology. 43(18). 16746–16757.

Wolf, Lukas J., et al.. (2023). Attitudes toward children: Distinguishing affection and stress. Journal of Personality. 92(2). 601–619. 3 indexed citations

Wolf, Lukas J., et al.. (2023). What about the children? The effectiveness of including children in environmental appeals. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 94. 102195–102195.

Wolf, Lukas J., et al.. (2021). The Salience of Children Increases Adult Prosocial Values. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 13(1). 160–169. 10 indexed citations

Hanel, Paul H. P., Uwe Wolfradt, Lukas J. Wolf, Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, & Gregory R. Maio. (2020). Well-being as a function of person-country fit in human values. Nature Communications. 11(1). 5150–5150. 22 indexed citations

Wolf, Lukas J., Geoffrey Haddock, Antony S. R. Manstead, & Gregory R. Maio. (2020). The importance of (shared) human values for containing the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology. 59(3). 618–627. 121 indexed citations

10.

Wolf, Lukas J., Netta Weinstein, & Gregory R. Maio. (2019). Anti-immigrant prejudice: Understanding the roles of (perceived) values and value dissimilarity.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 117(5). 925–953. 44 indexed citations

11.

Prentice, Mike, et al.. (2019). Strangers in a Strange Land: Relations Between Perceptions of Others' Values and Both Civic Engagement and Cultural Estrangement. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 559–559. 20 indexed citations

12.

Hanel, Paul H. P. & Lukas J. Wolf. (2019). Leavers and Remainers after the Brexit referendum: More united than divided after all?. British Journal of Social Psychology. 59(2). 470–493. 11 indexed citations

13.

Lannin, Daniel G., et al.. (2019). How Are Personal Values Linked to Help-Seeking Stigma?. The Counseling Psychologist. 48(2). 249–276. 3 indexed citations

14.

Coelho, Gabriel Lins de Holanda, Paul H. P. Hanel, & Lukas J. Wolf. (2018). The Very Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition: Developing a Six-Item Version. Assessment. 27(8). 1870–1885. 186 indexed citations

15.

Hanel, Paul H. P., Uwe Wolfradt, Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, et al.. (2018). The Perception of Family, City, and Country Values Is Often Biased. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 49(5). 831–850. 29 indexed citations

16.

Coelho, Gabriel Lins de Holanda, Patrícia Nunes da Fonsêca, Valdiney Velôso Gouveia, Lukas J. Wolf, & Roosevelt Vilar. (2018). De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - Short Version: Validation for the Brazilian Context. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto). 28(0). 9 indexed citations

17.

Wolf, Lukas J., Ulrich von Hecker, & Gregory R. Maio. (2017). Affective and Cognitive Orientations in Intergroup Perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 43(6). 828–844. 9 indexed citations

18.

Aquino, Antonio, Geoffrey Haddock, Gregory R. Maio, Lukas J. Wolf, & Francesca Romana Alparone. (2016). The Role of Affective and Cognitive Individual Differences in Social Perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 42(6). 798–810. 27 indexed citations

19.

Wolf, Lukas J., Gregory R. Maio, Johan C. Karremans, & Caroline Leygue. (2016). On implicit racial prejudice against infants. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 20(6). 789–800. 7 indexed citations

20.

Hecker, Ulrich von, et al.. (2015). Spatial processes in linear ordering.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 42(7). 1003–1033. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact