Lukas J. Wolf

977 citations
28 papers · 625 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Lukas J. Wolf

25 papers receiving 613 citations

Peers

Lukas J. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Applied Psychology 85
  • Social Psychology 232
  • General Decision Sciences 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 279
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 69
Replace Kátia Correa Vione with:
Kátia Correa Vione United Kingdom
Matt N Williams New Zealand
Liat Levontin Israel
Erica Molinario United States
Ke Michael United States
M.K. Ward United States
Miguel A. Sorrel Spain
Tim Hopthrow United Kingdom
Liman Man Wai Li Hong Kong
Fanli Jia United States
Lukas J. Wolf relative to Kátia Correa Vione United Kingdom Kátia Correa Vione's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Kátia Correa Vione · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lukas J. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lukas J. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukas J. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukas J. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lukas J. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukas J. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukas J. Wolf. The network helps show where Lukas J. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lukas J. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lukas J. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Lukas J. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018186
2 2020121
3 201768
4 201944
5 201829
6 201627
7 202022
8 201920
9 201515
10 202015
11 201911
12 202110
13 20179
14 20189
15 20248
16 20167
17 20205
18 20233
19 20193
20 20243

About Lukas J. Wolf

Lukas J. Wolf is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (17 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (15 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (85 citations), Social Psychology (232 citations), General Decision Sciences (16 citations), Sociology and Political Science (279 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (69 citations). Lukas J. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Paul H. P. Hanel, Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, Gregory R. Maio, Geoffrey Haddock, Netta Weinstein, Antony S. R. Manstead, Mathew P. White, Andrew Balmford, Sophus zu Ermgassen and Uwe Wolfradt. Their work appears in journals such as Social Psychological and Personality Science, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Environmental Science & Policy, British Journal of Social Psychology and Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact