Luise Reddemann
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Ursula GastH. WulffThomas BebloMartin DrießenMarkus MertensFriedrich G. WoermannHans J. MarkowitschMartina Piefke
- Topics
- Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (16 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (10 papers)Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Luise Reddemann
26 papers receiving 399 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Clinical Psychology 375
- Psychiatry and Mental health 173
- Cognitive Neuroscience 74
- Social Psychology 73
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Luise Reddemann
This map shows the geographic impact of Luise Reddemann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luise Reddemann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luise Reddemann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luise Reddemann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luise Reddemann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luise Reddemann. The network helps show where Luise Reddemann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luise Reddemann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luise Reddemann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luise Reddemann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luise Reddemann. Luise Reddemann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | Traumatherapie in der Gruppe | 1 |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | S3 – LEITLINIE Posttraumatische Belastungsstörung ICD-10: F43.1 | 41 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | [Treatment outcome of psychodynamic trauma therapy in an inpatient setting]. | 17 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 78 | |
| 14 | Dissociative Identity Disorder Frequently Misdiagnosed | 2 |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Different fMRI activation patterns of traumatic memory in Borderline personality disorder with and without additional posttraumatic stress disorder | 9 |
| 19 | 117 | |
| 20 | 37 |
About Luise Reddemann
Luise Reddemann is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cultural Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (16 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (10 papers) and Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (375 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (173 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (26 citations). Luise Reddemann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ursula Gast, H. Wulff, Thomas Beblo, Martin Drießen, Markus Mertens, Friedrich G. Woermann, Hans J. Markowitsch, Martina Piefke, Astrid Lampe and Nina Rullkoetter. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.