José Mata
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.2%
- Accounting top 1%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 0.5%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 1%
- Co-authors
- Pedro PortugalJosé A. F. MachadoPaulo GuimarãesPaul A. GeroskiLuı́s CabralMartin WoerterDavid B. AudretschThomas B. Åstebro
- Topics
- Firm Innovation and Growth (24 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers)Global trade and economics (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
José Mata
36 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Economics and Econometrics 2.8k
- Accounting 1.2k
- Management of Technology and Innovation 941
- Strategy and Management 703
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 674
Countries citing papers authored by José Mata
This map shows the geographic impact of José Mata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Mata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Mata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José Mata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Mata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Mata. The network helps show where José Mata may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Mata
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Mata. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Mata based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José Mata. José Mata is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 100 | |
| 7 | Preference for Skew in Lotteries: Evidence from the Laboratory | 2 |
| 8 | 317 | |
| 9 | Counterfactual decomposition of changes in wage distributions using quantile regressionbreakdown → | 899 |
| 10 | 86 | |
| 11 | 249 | |
| 12 | 145 | |
| 13 | Transitions in the labour market | 1 |
| 14 | Competition Policy in Portugal | 4 |
| 15 | 117 | |
| 16 | The Survival of New Plants: Start-Up Conditions and Post-Entry Evolution | 12 |
| 17 | 363 | |
| 18 | 125 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 45 |
About José Mata
José Mata is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 37 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Firm Innovation and Growth (24 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers) and Global trade and economics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (941 citations), Accounting (1.2k citations) and Economics and Econometrics (2.8k citations). José Mata has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pedro Portugal, José A. F. Machado, Paulo Guimarães, Paul A. Geroski, Luı́s Cabral, Martin Woerter, David B. Audretsch, Thomas B. Åstebro, Luís Santos‐Pinto and David A. Griffith. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Strategic Management Journal and Research Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.