Luís Mendes

1.1k citations
47 papers · 547 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Luís Mendes

40 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers

Luís Mendes
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Ophthalmology 191
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 20
  • Signal Processing 138
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 224
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 241
Replace Miguel Ángel Fernández Granero with:
Miguel Ángel Fernández Granero Spain
Rafael Verdú‐Monedero Spain
Aaron Wu United States
Jie Zhong China
Derek C. Stanford United States
Yanan Wu China
Kenneth R. Persons United States
A. Mosquera Spain
Shuanglang Feng China
Luís Mendes relative to Miguel Ángel Fernández Granero Spain Miguel Ángel Fernández Granero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.6×
Miguel Ángel Fernández Granero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luís Mendes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luís Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luís Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luís Mendes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luís Mendes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luís Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luís Mendes. The network helps show where Luís Mendes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luís Mendes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luís Mendes Line = papers co-authored together Luís Mendes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019172
2 201836
3 202031
4 201529
5 201227
6 202025
7 202118
8 202118
9 201617
10 201014
11 201614
12 202213
13 202113
14 20179
15 20169
16 20219
17 20238
18 20228
19 20227
20 20067

About Luís Mendes

Luís Mendes is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation and Signal Processing, having authored 47 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Imaging and Analysis (20 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (20 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques (7 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (6 papers), Music and Audio Processing (5 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (191 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (20 citations), Signal Processing (138 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (224 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (241 citations). Luís Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include José Cunha‐Vaz, Inês Marques, P. Carvalho, Ana Rita Santos, Rui Pedro Paiva, Torcato Santos, Nicos Maglaveras, Ioanna Chouvarda, Conceição Lobo and Eleni Perantoni. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology and Therapy, Journal of Personalized Medicine, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Ophthalmic Research and Physiological Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact