Ophthalmology and Therapy

972 papers and 8.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 972 papers published in Ophthalmology and Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Ophthalmology and Therapy usually cover Ophthalmology (774 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (601 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (213 papers) specifically the topics of Retinal Diseases and Treatments (381 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (350 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (265 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ophthalmology and Therapy are Ejaz Ansari, Majid Moshirfar, Andrea Leonardi, Andrzej Grzybowski, Michael W. Stewart, Leon Au, Maria B. Grant, Jorge L. Alió, Pavi Agrawal and Giuseppe Querques.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ophthalmology and Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ophthalmology and Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ophthalmology and Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Ophthalmology and Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ophthalmology and Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ophthalmology and Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ophthalmology and Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025