Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Luis Díez-Picazo
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Díez-Picazo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Díez-Picazo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Díez-Picazo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luis Díez-Picazo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Díez-Picazo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Díez-Picazo. The network helps show where Luis Díez-Picazo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luis Díez-Picazo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luis Díez-Picazo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luis Díez-Picazo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Luis Díez-Picazo. Luis Díez-Picazo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (2002). Derecho a la vida y a la integridad física y moral. 2003–2020.1 indexed citations
7.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (2001). Qué diferencia hay entre un tratado y una constitución. 85–102.1 indexed citations
8.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (1999). Bioética y legislación (Dificultades de la regulación jurídica en materia de bioética). Revista de occidente. 5–11.1 indexed citations
9.
Díez-Picazo, Luis, et al.. (1998). El Derecho Comunitario en la jurisprudencia constitucional española. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional. 18(54). 255–272.
10.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (1997). La justicia y el sistema de fuentes del Derecho. 205–218.
11.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (1997). Publicidad y secreto en la Constitución. Cuadernos de derecho judicial. 43–62.
12.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (1994). Dificultades prácticas y significado constitucional del recurso de amparo. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional. 14(40). 9–37.2 indexed citations
13.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (1993). Derecho comunitario y medidas sancionadoras. Civitas. Revista española de derecho administrativo. 251–274.1 indexed citations
14.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (1993). Reflexiones sobre la idea de Constitución Europea. 20(2). 533–562.3 indexed citations
15.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (1992). Notas de Derecho comparado sobre la independencia judicial. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional. 12(34). 19–40.1 indexed citations
16.
Díez-Picazo, Luis, et al.. (1991). Derecho civil de España.8 indexed citations
17.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (1990). La derogación de las leyes. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 30(19). 1669–73.3 indexed citations
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (1982). La doctrina del precedente administrativo. Revista de Administración Pública. 7–46.9 indexed citations
20.
Díez-Picazo, Luis. (1976). Autonomía privada y Derechos Reales. Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario. 52(513). 273–306.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.