Luís de Sousa

1.3k total citations
57 papers, 779 citations indexed

About

Luís de Sousa is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Luís de Sousa has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 779 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 21 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 8 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Luís de Sousa's work include Corruption and Economic Development (20 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (8 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers). Luís de Sousa is often cited by papers focused on Corruption and Economic Development (20 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (8 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers). Luís de Sousa collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, Italy and United Kingdom. Luís de Sousa's co-authors include Nuno F. da Cruz, Susana Jorge, António F. Tavares, Rui Cunha Marques, Marcelo Moriconi, Pedro C. Magalhães, Luciano Amaral, Isabel R. Pinto, Andrés Malamud and Antonino Marvuglia and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Indicators Research and American Behavioral Scientist.

In The Last Decade

Luís de Sousa

50 papers receiving 702 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luís de Sousa Portugal 13 362 335 151 101 78 57 779
Ronen Palan United Kingdom 16 335 0.9× 292 0.9× 219 1.5× 167 1.7× 25 0.3× 51 944
Kathe Callahan United States 11 340 0.9× 232 0.7× 64 0.4× 73 0.7× 317 4.1× 21 721
Jen Nelles United Kingdom 16 399 1.1× 169 0.5× 118 0.8× 134 1.3× 61 0.8× 54 833
Joshua Newman Australia 15 327 0.9× 170 0.5× 74 0.5× 56 0.6× 225 2.9× 35 803
Karin Geuijen Netherlands 11 160 0.4× 202 0.6× 43 0.3× 84 0.8× 113 1.4× 20 641
Carey Doberstein Canada 11 150 0.4× 191 0.6× 53 0.4× 92 0.9× 163 2.1× 28 541
Ida Widianingsih Indonesia 14 87 0.2× 192 0.6× 84 0.6× 43 0.4× 16 0.2× 131 589
Chad R. Miller United States 10 118 0.3× 370 1.1× 231 1.5× 71 0.7× 19 0.2× 28 1.1k
Jeremy Mitchell United Kingdom 6 138 0.4× 134 0.4× 78 0.5× 153 1.5× 100 1.3× 25 551
Martijn Groenleer Netherlands 15 445 1.2× 213 0.6× 56 0.4× 259 2.6× 154 2.0× 61 854

Countries citing papers authored by Luís de Sousa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luís de Sousa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luís de Sousa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luís de Sousa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luís de Sousa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luís de Sousa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luís de Sousa. The network helps show where Luís de Sousa may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luís de Sousa

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luís de Sousa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luís de Sousa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luís de Sousa. Luís de Sousa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Alcantara, Christopher & Luís de Sousa. (2025). From Reconciliation to Reversal: Explaining Reconciliatory Backsliding in Settler Societies. Political Studies Review.
2.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2024). Democratic values, relative deprivation, political trust, and the resilience of corruption in Portugal: a survey analysis. Crime Law and Social Change. 82(3). 517–541. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pereira, Miguel M., et al.. (2023). Politicians Support (and Voters Reward) Intra-Party Reforms to Promote Transparency. Party Politics. 31(1). 40–54. 6 indexed citations
4.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2023). Why are individuals unwilling to report corruption? An inquiry into perception‐based definitions of corruption and employment‐related factors. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 83(4). 625–646. 2 indexed citations
5.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2023). Deontological and Consequentialist Ethics and Attitudes Towards Corruption: A Survey Data Analysis. Social Indicators Research. 170(2). 507–541. 11 indexed citations
6.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2023). Mapping conceptualisations and evaluations of corruption through survey questions: five decades of public opinion-centred research. European Political Science. 22(3). 368–383. 2 indexed citations
7.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2022). Knowledge of official ethical standards and tolerance towards corruption: An exploratory study. Repositório Institucional do ISCTE-IUL (ISCTE-IUL). 24(1). 3–28. 3 indexed citations
8.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2021). Opportunities and challenges of contemporary corruption research: An interview with Donatella Della Porta. Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa (University of Lisbon). 23(2). 1 indexed citations
9.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2020). Is Populism Bad For Business? Assessing The Reputational Effect Of Populist Incumbents. Swiss Political Science Review. 27(1). 1–20. 8 indexed citations
10.
Delicado, Ana, et al.. (2018). Changing societies: legacies and challenges. The diverse worlds of sustainability. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). 7 indexed citations
11.
Sousa, Luís de. (2018). Measuring the enforcement capacity of political financing supervisory bodies. European Political Science. 18(2). 189–204. 4 indexed citations
12.
Sousa, Luís de. (2016). the gentle lion: in memory of hans daalder. European Political Science. 16(1). 113–115. 1 indexed citations
13.
Mastrucci, Alessio, et al.. (2015). GIS-based Life Cycle Assessment of urban building stocks retrofitting- a bottom-up framework applied to Luxembourg. Advances in computer science research. 22. 23 indexed citations
14.
Pinto, António Costa, Luís de Sousa, & Pedro C. Magalhães. (2013). A qualidade da democracia em Portugal: a visão dos cidadãos. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). 2 indexed citations
15.
Sousa, Luís de & Andrés Malamud. (2012). Introduction: Looking from the Outside in – How Europe is Studied Abroad. European Political Science. 11(3). 279–284. 2 indexed citations
16.
Pinto, António Costa, Pedro C. Magalhães, & Luís de Sousa. (2011). Is the Good Polity Attainable? – Measuring the Quality of Democracy. European Political Science. 11(4). 447–455. 4 indexed citations
17.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2011). How to monitor and evaluate anti-corruption agencies: Guidelines for agencies, donors, and evaluators. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)). 14 indexed citations
18.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2010). Forty Years of European Political Science. European Political Science. 9(S1). S1–S10. 6 indexed citations
19.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2010). Taking the Right Seriously. European Political Science. 9(4). 446–453. 12 indexed citations
20.
Sousa, Luís de, et al.. (2006). Frecuencia de uso de óxido de etileno en áreas deesterilización de centros asistenciales de Valencia y sus efectos a la salud. 10(3). 15–18. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026