Luis Álvarez-Rocha

1.3k total citations
7 papers, 350 citations indexed

About

Luis Álvarez-Rocha is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Luis Álvarez-Rocha has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 350 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 5 papers in Epidemiology and 2 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Luis Álvarez-Rocha's work include Nosocomial Infections in ICU (5 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (2 papers) and Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (2 papers). Luis Álvarez-Rocha is often cited by papers focused on Nosocomial Infections in ICU (5 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (2 papers) and Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (2 papers). Luis Álvarez-Rocha collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Ireland and Brazil. Luis Álvarez-Rocha's co-authors include Ricard Ferrer, Gemma Gomà, Antonio Artigas, María Luisa Martínez, David L. Suarez, Raquel Guillamat‐Prats, Mitchell M. Levy, Ignacio Martín‐Loeches, Juan Carlos Pozo Laderas and Rafael Zaragoza and has published in prestigious journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Intensive Care Medicine and Critical Care.

In The Last Decade

Luis Álvarez-Rocha

7 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Luis Álvarez-Rocha Spain	7	238	152	89	71	43	7	350
Leonel Lagunes Spain	11	237 1.0×	219 1.4×	121 1.4×	68 1.0×	90 2.1×	19	457
Michael Wilke Germany	12	169 0.7×	123 0.8×	99 1.1×	77 1.1×	28 0.7×	39	423
J. Insausti Spain	10	189 0.8×	56 0.4×	124 1.4×	45 0.6×	47 1.1×	29	356
Beatriz Galván Spain	5	313 1.3×	359 2.4×	75 0.8×	80 1.1×	69 1.6×	8	497
Juliette Patrier France	11	175 0.7×	144 0.9×	114 1.3×	83 1.2×	36 0.8×	20	406
Anna Huang United States	4	198 0.8×	109 0.7×	51 0.6×	51 0.7×	34 0.8×	6	316
C. León-Gil Spain	4	208 0.9×	193 1.3×	96 1.1×	46 0.6×	58 1.3×	4	409
R. Granada Spain	8	279 1.2×	93 0.6×	80 0.9×	50 0.7×	96 2.2×	11	467
P. Balvay France	6	120 0.5×	159 1.0×	77 0.9×	79 1.1×	61 1.4×	8	361
Sherene Fakhran United States	9	347 1.5×	117 0.8×	100 1.1×	36 0.5×	75 1.7×	15	546

Countries citing papers authored by Luis Álvarez-Rocha

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Álvarez-Rocha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Álvarez-Rocha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Álvarez-Rocha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luis Álvarez-Rocha

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Álvarez-Rocha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Álvarez-Rocha. The network helps show where Luis Álvarez-Rocha may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luis Álvarez-Rocha

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luis Álvarez-Rocha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luis Álvarez-Rocha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luis Álvarez-Rocha. Luis Álvarez-Rocha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Ferrer, Ricard, María Luisa Martínez, Gemma Gomà, et al.. (2018). Improved empirical antibiotic treatment of sepsis after an educational intervention: the ABISS-Edusepsis study. Critical Care. 22(1). 167–167. 39 indexed citations

2.

Martínez, María Luisa, Ricard Ferrer, Raquel Guillamat‐Prats, et al.. (2016). Impact of Source Control in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock*. Critical Care Medicine. 45(1). 11–19. 113 indexed citations

3.

Calbo, Esther, Luis Álvarez-Rocha, Francisco Gudiol, & Juan Pasquau. (2013). A review of the factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. 31. 12–15. 29 indexed citations

4.

Garnacho‐Montero, José, Pedro Olaechea, Francisco Álvarez-Lerma, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of fungal respiratory infections in the critically ill patient.. PubMed. 26(2). 173–88. 74 indexed citations

5.

León, Cristóbal, Sergio Ruiz‐Santana, Pedro Saavedra, et al.. (2012). Value of β-d-glucan and Candida albicans germ tube antibody for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in patients with severe abdominal conditions. Intensive Care Medicine. 38(8). 1315–1325. 75 indexed citations

6.

Álvarez-Rocha, Luis, Juan-Ignacio Alós, José Blanquer, et al.. (2005). Guías para el manejo de la neumonía comunitaria del adulto que precisa ingreso en el hospital. Medicina Intensiva. 29(1). 21–62. 7 indexed citations

7.

Barroso-Barcenilla, Fernando, et al.. (2001). Antibacterial Treatment of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation???Associated Pneumonia. Drugs & Aging. 18(3). 189–200. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact