Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Hypothesizing — Circularity — Neutrality: Three Guidelines for the Conductor of the Session
1980557 citationsLuigi Boscolo, Gianfranco Cecchin et al.Family Processprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Luigi Boscolo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luigi Boscolo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luigi Boscolo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luigi Boscolo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luigi Boscolo. The network helps show where Luigi Boscolo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luigi Boscolo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luigi Boscolo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luigi Boscolo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Luigi Boscolo. Luigi Boscolo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Boscolo, Luigi, et al.. (2019). The Times of Time.1 indexed citations
Boscolo, Luigi, et al.. (2008). Terapia sistémica individual. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).6 indexed citations
5.
Boscolo, Luigi & Paolo Bertrando. (1996). Los tiempos del tiempo: una nueva perspectiva para la consulta y la terapia sistémicas. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).1 indexed citations
Boscolo, Luigi & Paolo Bertrando. (1993). The Times of Time: A New Perspective in Systemic Therapy and Consultation. Medical Entomology and Zoology.23 indexed citations
Boscolo, Luigi, et al.. (1991). Linguaggio e cambiamento. L'uso di parole chiave in terapia.1 indexed citations
10.
Boscolo, Luigi, et al.. (1987). Familiar realities : the Heidelberg conference. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
11.
Boscolo, Luigi, Gianfranco Cecchin, Lynn Hoffman, & Peggy Penn. (1987). Milan Systemic Family Therapy: Conversations In Theory And Practice.120 indexed citations
12.
Palazzoli, Mara Selvini, Luigi Boscolo, Gianfranco Cecchin, & Giuliana Prata. (1981). Hypothetisieren — Zirkularität — Neutralität: Drei Richtlinien für den Leiter der Sitzung. Familiendynamik. 6(2). 123–139.7 indexed citations
13.
Palazzoli, Mara Selvini, Luigi Boscolo, Gianfranco Cecchin, & Giuliana Prata. (1980). The Problem of the Referring Person*. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 6(1). 3–9.103 indexed citations
14.
Boscolo, Luigi, et al.. (1980). Hypothesizing — Circularity — Neutrality: Three Guidelines for the Conductor of the Session. Family Process. 19(1). 3–12.557 indexed citations breakdown →
Palazzoli, Mara Selvini, Luigi Boscolo, Gianfranco Cecchin, & Giuliana Prata. (1977). Die erste Sitzung einer systemischen Familientherapie. Familiendynamik. 2(3). 197–207.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.