Luc Téot

7.9k total citations · 3 hit papers
138 papers, 5.3k citations indexed

About

Luc Téot is a scholar working on Surgery, Rehabilitation and Occupational Therapy. According to data from OpenAlex, Luc Téot has authored 138 papers receiving a total of 5.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 81 papers in Surgery, 63 papers in Rehabilitation and 27 papers in Occupational Therapy. Recurrent topics in Luc Téot's work include Wound Healing and Treatments (63 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (33 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (27 papers). Luc Téot is often cited by papers focused on Wound Healing and Treatments (63 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (33 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (27 papers). Luc Téot collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Luc Téot's co-authors include Keith G Harding, Wolfgang Vanscheidt, Ulrich E. Ziegler, Marco Romanelli, Vincent Falanga, S. Meaume, Elizabeth A. Ayello, Michael Stacey, Gregory S. Schultz and Caroline Dowsett and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Diabetes Care.

In The Last Decade

Luc Téot

128 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Hit Papers

Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound man... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2003 2002 2023 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luc Téot France 34 2.8k 2.7k 1.4k 975 873 138 5.3k
William H. Eaglstein United States 42 3.4k 1.2× 2.4k 0.9× 1.2k 0.9× 824 0.8× 787 0.9× 130 6.6k
I. Kelman Cohen United States 40 2.9k 1.0× 2.1k 0.8× 1.5k 1.1× 435 0.4× 564 0.6× 123 6.1k
Christopher E. Attinger United States 49 4.6k 1.6× 5.0k 1.9× 493 0.4× 1.4k 1.4× 3.3k 3.8× 273 9.3k
Mark S. Granick United States 30 1.3k 0.5× 1.8k 0.7× 356 0.3× 363 0.4× 355 0.4× 190 4.8k
Marissa J. Carter United States 34 2.5k 0.9× 1.3k 0.5× 170 0.1× 1.1k 1.2× 1.2k 1.4× 126 4.4k
Robert G. Frykberg United States 41 5.1k 1.8× 2.0k 0.7× 394 0.3× 2.5k 2.5× 5.4k 6.2× 99 8.0k
Linda G. Phillips United States 30 1.1k 0.4× 1.4k 0.5× 327 0.2× 545 0.6× 337 0.4× 103 2.9k
Wolfgang Vanscheidt Germany 24 1.3k 0.5× 1.3k 0.5× 376 0.3× 628 0.6× 459 0.5× 103 2.7k
Paul P. M. van Zuijlen Netherlands 42 3.1k 1.1× 2.8k 1.0× 2.6k 1.9× 286 0.3× 109 0.1× 179 6.5k
Michael S. Golinko United States 11 2.4k 0.9× 901 0.3× 325 0.2× 486 0.5× 526 0.6× 49 4.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Luc Téot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luc Téot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luc Téot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luc Téot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luc Téot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luc Téot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luc Téot. The network helps show where Luc Téot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luc Téot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luc Téot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luc Téot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luc Téot. Luc Téot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chaumont, Marc, et al.. (2025). Chronic Ulcers Healing Prediction through Machine Learning Approaches: Preliminary Results on Diabetic Foot Ulcers Case Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 14(9). 2943–2943. 3 indexed citations
2.
Kim, Paul J., Luis G. Fernández, Abigail E. Chaffin, et al.. (2024). Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus Statements and Recommendations for Use of Hypochlorous Acid as a Solution for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation. WOUNDS A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice. 36(4). 108–114.
3.
Zakine, G., et al.. (2023). A Retrospective Self-Controlled Study Evaluating the Prophylactic Effects of CACIPLIQ20 on Postsurgical Scars. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5. ojad031–ojad031. 1 indexed citations
5.
Tchero, Huidi, et al.. (2019). Management of infected diabetic wound: a scoping review of guidelines. F1000Research. 8. 737–737. 9 indexed citations
6.
Téot, Luc, et al.. (2018). REAL-WORLD CLINICAL EVALUATION AND COSTS OF TELEMEDICINE FOR CHRONIC WOUND MANAGEMENT. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 34(6). 567–575. 28 indexed citations
7.
Brinkert, David, et al.. (2013). Negative pressure wound therapy with saline instillation: 131 patient case series. International Wound Journal. 10(s1). 56–60. 89 indexed citations
8.
Middelkoop, Esther, et al.. (2011). Scar management: practical guidelines. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 10 indexed citations
9.
Vanscheidt, Wolfgang, Keith G Harding, Luc Téot, & Jörg Siebert. (2011). Effectiveness and tissue compatibility of a 12‐week treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers with an octenidine based antiseptic – a randomized, double‐blind controlled study. International Wound Journal. 9(3). 316–323. 36 indexed citations
10.
Hamed, Saher, Yehuda Ullmann, Dana Egozi, et al.. (2011). Fibronectin Potentiates Topical Erythropoietin-Induced Wound Repair in Diabetic Mice. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 131(6). 1365–1374. 57 indexed citations
11.
Hamed, Saher, et al.. (2009). Topical Erythropoietin Promotes Wound Repair in Diabetic Rats. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 130(1). 287–294. 84 indexed citations
12.
Banwell, Paul E., Luc Téot, Elof Eriksson, et al.. (2008). Topical negative pressure wound therapy: a review of its role and guidelines for its use in the management of acute wounds. International Wound Journal. 5(4). 511–529. 90 indexed citations
13.
Téot, Luc, et al.. (2007). Evidence‐based medicine: vacuum‐assisted closure in wound care management. International Wound Journal. 4(3). 256–269. 77 indexed citations
14.
Meaume, Sylvie, Luc Téot, & O. Dereure. (2005). Wound healing university diplomas in France: an impact measurement after 6 years. International Wound Journal. 2(2). 96–102.
15.
Téot, Luc, et al.. (2003). DERMAROB : A Partial Thickness Skin Harvesting Robot: Technical and Experimental Data. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 1 indexed citations
16.
Leaper, D J, et al.. (2002). Growth factors and interactive dressings in wound repair. 7(12). 4202–8. 3 indexed citations
17.
Téot, Luc, et al.. (1999). Use of Free Scapular Crest Flap in Pediatric Epiphyseal Reconstructive Procedures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 365(365). 211–220. 12 indexed citations
18.
Téot, Luc, et al.. (1992). Pedicle Scapular Apophysis Transplantation in Congenital Limb Malformations. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 29(4). 332–340. 12 indexed citations
19.
Téot, Luc, et al.. (1992). Ultrasonography of the normal and abnormal antenatal development of the upper limb. Annales de Chirurgie de la Main et du Membre Supérieur. 11(5). 389–400. 2 indexed citations
20.
Téot, Luc, et al.. (1982). Vascularisation épiphysaire pendant la croissance. Etude préliminaire à la transplantation.. 68(6). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026