Louis‐Philippe Fortier
- Surgery top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 1%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Pierre DroletPhilippe RichebéOlivier VerdonckFrançois DonatiFran ois DonatiJean‐François PouliotKim TurnerPhilip M. Jones
- Topics
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (18 papers)Anesthesia and Pain Management (15 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers)
- Cited by
- Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineDevelopmental NeuroscienceCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- CanadaFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Louis‐Philippe Fortier
38 papers receiving 754 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Surgery 421
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 414
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 259
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 112
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 105
Countries citing papers authored by Louis‐Philippe Fortier
This map shows the geographic impact of Louis‐Philippe Fortier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis‐Philippe Fortier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis‐Philippe Fortier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louis‐Philippe Fortier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis‐Philippe Fortier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis‐Philippe Fortier. The network helps show where Louis‐Philippe Fortier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louis‐Philippe Fortier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louis‐Philippe Fortier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louis‐Philippe Fortier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louis‐Philippe Fortier. Louis‐Philippe Fortier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 125 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Louis‐Philippe Fortier
Louis‐Philippe Fortier is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 771 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (18 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (15 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (414 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (104 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (112 citations). Louis‐Philippe Fortier has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Drolet, Philippe Richebé, Olivier Verdonck, François Donati, Fran ois Donati, Jean‐François Pouliot, Kim Turner, Philip M. Jones, Dolores M. McKeen and Alan Chaput. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Annals of Surgery and Anesthesiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.