Philip M. Jones
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 0.2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Emergency Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Timothy P. TurkstraRichard A. CherryChristopher HarleBob KiaiiMichael ChuDaniel BainbridgeKevin ArmstrongPaidrig Armstrong
- Topics
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (22 papers)Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (19 papers)Tracheal and airway disorders (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Philip M. Jones
85 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1.0k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 920
- Surgery 826
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 576
- Emergency Medicine 253
Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Jones. The network helps show where Philip M. Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Jones. Philip M. Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 74 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 125 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 47 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 64 |
About Philip M. Jones
Philip M. Jones is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Internal Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (22 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (19 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1.0k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (920 citations) and Emergency Medicine (253 citations). Philip M. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Timothy P. Turkstra, Richard A. Cherry, Christopher Harle, Bob Kiaii, Michael Chu, Daniel Bainbridge, Kevin Armstrong, Paidrig Armstrong, David M. Pelz and George Kovács. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.