Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates
2005575 citationsChristopher Kennedy, Louise McNallyLanguageprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Louise McNally
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Louise McNally's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise McNally with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise McNally more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise McNally. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise McNally. The network helps show where Louise McNally may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louise McNally
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louise McNally.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louise McNally based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Louise McNally. Louise McNally is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McNally, Louise. (2019). Scalar Alternatives and Scalar Inference Involving Adjectives: A Comment on van Tiel, et al.(2016). 42(3). 2–12.5 indexed citations
McNally, Louise & Berit Gehrke. (2014). Event individuation by objects: evidence from frequency adjectives. Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra). 18. 146–163.2 indexed citations
9.
Boleda, Gemma, Marco Baroni, & Louise McNally. (2013). Intensionality was only alleged: On adjective-noun composition in distributional semantics. RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya). 35–46.26 indexed citations
10.
Boleda, Gemma, et al.. (2012). First Order vs. Higher Order Modification in Distributional Semantics. Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento). 1223–1233.15 indexed citations
11.
Arsenijević, Boban, et al.. (2010). Ethnic adjectives are proper adjectives. QRU Quaderns de Recerca en Urbanisme. 1–15.2 indexed citations
McNally, Louise & Christopher Kennedy. (2008). Adjectives and adverbs : syntax, semantics, and discourse. Oxford University Press eBooks.89 indexed citations
McNally, Louise. (1992). VP Coordination and the VP-Internal Subject Hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry. 23(2). 336–340.23 indexed citations
20.
McNally, Louise. (1992). An interpretation for the English existential construction. University Microfilms International eBooks.63 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.