Lorraine Tucker

743 total citations
9 papers, 504 citations indexed

About

Lorraine Tucker is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Lorraine Tucker has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 504 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 5 papers in Oncology and 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Lorraine Tucker's work include Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers) and AI in cancer detection (5 papers). Lorraine Tucker is often cited by papers focused on Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers) and AI in cancer detection (5 papers). Lorraine Tucker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and India. Lorraine Tucker's co-authors include Fiona J. Gilbert, Oliver Morrish, Paula Willsher, Stephen W. Duffy, Maureen Gc Gillan, Karen A. Duncan, Susan Astley, Michael Michell, Julie Cooke and Yit Yoong Lim and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Radiology and European Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Lorraine Tucker

8 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Lorraine Tucker

PRM

AI

RNMI

ONCOL

CR

Paula Willsher United Kingdom

Oliver Morrish United Kingdom

Victor J. Catullo United States

Hilde Bjørndal Norway

Lauren Pantalone United States

Åsne Sørlien Holen Norway

Anne C. Kushwaha United States

Solveig Roth Hoff Norway

Renee W. Pinsky United States

Andrea Arieno United Kingdom

Paula Willsher United Kingdom

Lorraine Tucker

349 ×0.9

PRM

270 ×0.8

AI

230 ×0.9

RNMI

129 ×0.8

ONCOL

54 ×0.9

CR

Citations per year, relative to Lorraine Tucker Lorraine Tucker (= 1×) peers Paula Willsher

Countries citing papers authored by Lorraine Tucker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lorraine Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorraine Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorraine Tucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lorraine Tucker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorraine Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorraine Tucker. The network helps show where Lorraine Tucker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lorraine Tucker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lorraine Tucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lorraine Tucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lorraine Tucker. Lorraine Tucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Duffy, Stephen W., Oliver Morrish, P C Allgood, et al.. (2017). Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer. 88. 48–56. 59 indexed citations

2.

Kaushal, Aradhna, Amanda Ramirez, Fiona Warburton, et al.. (2016). “Promoting Early Presentation” intervention sustains increased breast cancer awareness in older women for three years: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Screening. 24(3). 163–165. 4 indexed citations

3.

Gilbert, Fiona J., et al.. (2015). Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool. Clinical Radiology. 71(2). 141–150. 104 indexed citations

4.

Morrish, Oliver, Lorraine Tucker, Richard Black, et al.. (2015). Mammographic Breast Density: Comparison of Methods for Quantitative Evaluation. Radiology. 275(2). 356–365. 45 indexed citations

5.

Gilbert, Fiona J., Lorraine Tucker, Maureen Gc Gillan, et al.. (2015). Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Depicting Breast Cancer Subgroups in a UK Retrospective Reading Study (TOMMY Trial). Radiology. 277(3). 697–706. 137 indexed citations

6.

Gilbert, Fiona J., Lorraine Tucker, Maureen Gc Gillan, et al.. (2015). The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme – a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone. Health Technology Assessment. 19(4). 1–136. 138 indexed citations

7.

Tucker, Lorraine, et al.. (2015). Diagnostic implications of digital breast tomosynthesis in symptomatic patients. Breast Cancer Research. 17(S1). 1 indexed citations

8.

Burgess, Caroline, et al.. (2012). Training radiographers to deliver an intervention to promote early presentation of breast cancer. Radiography. 18(4). 232–237. 3 indexed citations

9.

Forbes, Lindsay, Alice S. Forster, Rachael H Dodd, et al.. (2012). Promoting Early Presentation of Breast Cancer in Older Women: Implementing an Evidence-Based Intervention in Routine Clinical Practice. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2012. 1–6. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact