Amy E. Kelly

686 total citations
11 papers, 457 citations indexed

About

Amy E. Kelly is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy E. Kelly has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 457 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Amy E. Kelly's work include Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and AI in cancer detection (4 papers). Amy E. Kelly is often cited by papers focused on Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and AI in cancer detection (4 papers). Amy E. Kelly collaborates with scholars based in United States. Amy E. Kelly's co-authors include Jules H. Sumkin, Andriy I. Bandos, Margarita L. Zuley, Amy Lu, Marie A. Ganott, Victor J. Catullo, David Gur, Denise M. Chough, Luisa P. Wallace and Christiane M. Hakim and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, Academic Radiology and Journal of Breast Imaging.

In The Last Decade

Amy E. Kelly

11 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Amy E. Kelly
Renee W. Pinsky United States
Renee Morgan United Kingdom
Andrea Arieno United Kingdom
Victor J. Pizzitola United States
Jessica Torrente United States
Marc Inciardi United States
Anne C. Kushwaha United States
Renee W. Pinsky United States
Amy E. Kelly
Citations per year, relative to Amy E. Kelly Amy E. Kelly (= 1×) peers Renee W. Pinsky

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Kelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Kelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Kelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Kelly. The network helps show where Amy E. Kelly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy E. Kelly

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy E. Kelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy E. Kelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy E. Kelly. Amy E. Kelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Berg, Wendie A., Amy Lu, Jeremy M Berg, et al.. (2025). Screening for Breast Cancer with Contrast-enhanced Mammography as an Alternative to MRI: SCEMAM Trial Results. Radiology. 315(3). e242634–e242634. 1 indexed citations
2.
Zuley, Margarita L., Richard E. Sharpe, Victor J. Pizzitola, et al.. (2025). Relative Costs and Outcomes of a Contrast-Enhanced Mammography-Guided Biopsy Trial. Journal of Breast Imaging. 7(5). 541–550. 1 indexed citations
3.
Berg, Wendie A., Jeremy M Berg, Andriy I. Bandos, et al.. (2024). Addition of Contrast-enhanced Mammography to Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Prospective TOCEM Trial Interim Analysis. Radiology. 311(1). e231991–e231991. 12 indexed citations
4.
Arefan, Dooman, Marie A. Ganott, Amy E. Kelly, et al.. (2023). Contrast-enhanced Mammography-guided Biopsy: Initial Trial and Experience. Journal of Breast Imaging. 5(2). 148–158. 12 indexed citations
5.
Sumkin, Jules H., Wendie A. Berg, Gloria J Carter, et al.. (2019). Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. Radiology. 293(3). 531–540. 67 indexed citations
6.
Zuley, Margarita L., Andriy I. Bandos, Gordon S. Abrams, et al.. (2019). Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) Helps to Safely Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies for Low to Moderately Suspicious Soft Tissue Lesions. Academic Radiology. 27(7). 969–976. 25 indexed citations
8.
Hakim, Christiane M., Victor J. Catullo, Denise M. Chough, et al.. (2015). Effect of the Availability of Prior Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images on the Interpretation of Mammograms. Radiology. 276(1). 65–72. 22 indexed citations
9.
Zuley, Margarita L., Victor J. Catullo, Denise M. Chough, et al.. (2014). Comparison of Two-dimensional Synthesized Mammograms versus Original Digital Mammograms Alone and in Combination with Tomosynthesis Images. Radiology. 271(3). 664–671. 144 indexed citations
10.
Ganott, Marie A., Margarita L. Zuley, Gordon S. Abrams, et al.. (2014). Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy versus Fine Needle Aspiration for Evaluation of Axillary Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Breast Cancer. ISRN Oncology. 2014. 1–9. 44 indexed citations
11.
Zuley, Margarita L., Andriy I. Bandos, Marie A. Ganott, et al.. (2012). Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Supplemental Diagnostic Mammographic Views for Evaluation of Noncalcified Breast Lesions. Radiology. 266(1). 89–95. 128 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026