Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer
20001.1k citationsUwe Scherf, Douglas T. Ross et al.Nature Geneticsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Lorraine Tanabe
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lorraine Tanabe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorraine Tanabe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorraine Tanabe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorraine Tanabe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorraine Tanabe. The network helps show where Lorraine Tanabe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lorraine Tanabe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lorraine Tanabe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lorraine Tanabe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lorraine Tanabe. Lorraine Tanabe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Demner‐Fushman, Dina, Susanne M. Humphrey, Nicholas C. Ide, et al.. (2006). Finding Relevant Passages in Scientific Articles: Fusion of Automatic Approaches vs. an Interactive Team Effort.. Text REtrieval Conference.13 indexed citations
Aronson, Alan R., Dina Demner‐Fushman, Susanne M. Humphrey, et al.. (2005). Fusion of knowledge-intensive and statistical approaches for retrieving and annotating textual genomics documents.29 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Lee, Lorraine Tanabe, Thomas C. Rindflesch, & W. John Wilbur. (2005). MedTag. 32–37.6 indexed citations
9.
Aronson, Alan R., Susanne M. Humphrey, Nicholas C. Ide, et al.. (2004). Knowledge-Intensive and Statistical Approaches to the Retrieval and Annotation of Genomics MEDLINE Citations.. Text REtrieval Conference.10 indexed citations
10.
Cohen, Kevin Bretonnel, et al.. (2004). A resource for constructing customized test suites for molecular biology entity identification systems. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1–8.14 indexed citations
Kayaalp, Mehmet, Alan R. Aronson, Susanne M. Humphrey, et al.. (2003). Methods for Accurate Retrieval of MEDLINE Citations in Functional Genomics.. Text REtrieval Conference. 17(3). 441–450.10 indexed citations
Scherf, Uwe, Douglas T. Ross, Mark Waltham, et al.. (2000). A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Nature Genetics. 24(3). 236–244.1087 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.