A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer

1.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2000, received 1.1k indexed citations. Written by Uwe Scherf, Douglas T. Ross, Mark Waltham, Lawrence H. Smith, Jae K. Lee, Lorraine Tanabe, Kurt W. Kohn, William C. Reinhold, Timothy G. Myers and Darren T. Andrews covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (852 citations), Oncology (216 citations) and Cancer Research (149 citations). Published in Nature Genetics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/73439 →

Countries where authors are citing A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/73439.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026