Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery
2017371 citationsLorne A Becker, Chris Mavergames et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Lorne A Becker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lorne A Becker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorne A Becker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorne A Becker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorne A Becker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorne A Becker. The network helps show where Lorne A Becker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lorne A Becker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lorne A Becker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lorne A Becker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lorne A Becker. Lorne A Becker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Susan M., Tom Fahey, John Smucny, & Lorne A Becker. (2017). Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(6).50 indexed citations
Smith, Susan M., Tom Fahey, John Smucny, & Lorne A Becker. (2014). Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD000245–CD000245.113 indexed citations
6.
Trotti, Lynn Marie, et al.. (2012). Iron for restless legs syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD007834–CD007834.56 indexed citations
7.
Becker, Lorne A, Jeffrey Hom, Miguel Ángel Villasís-Keever, & Johannes C. van der Wouden. (2011). Beta2-agonists for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD001726–CD001726.23 indexed citations
Smucny, John, Lorne A Becker, & Richard H. Glazier. (2006). Beta2-agonists for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD001726–CD001726.13 indexed citations
Smucny, John, Cheryl A. Flynn, Lorne A Becker, & Richard H. Glazier. (2004). Beta2-agonists for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD001726–CD001726.48 indexed citations
14.
Schultz, Johannes, et al.. (2002). Effect of enhancing partner support to improve smoking cessation: a meta-analysis.. Gajeong yihag hoeji. 23(3). 301–312.2 indexed citations
Smucny, John, Tom Fahey, Lorne A Becker, & Richard H. Glazier. (2000). Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD000245–CD000245.44 indexed citations
17.
Flynn, Cheryl A., et al.. (2000). Beta2-agonists for acute bronchitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD001726–CD001726.5 indexed citations
Becker, Lorne A, et al.. (1988). Spontaneous abortion in primary care. A report from ASPN.. PubMed. 1(1). 15–23.18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.