Lorenz Demey

758 total citations
47 papers, 250 citations indexed

About

Lorenz Demey is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Lorenz Demey has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 250 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 24 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 16 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Lorenz Demey's work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (25 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (22 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers). Lorenz Demey is often cited by papers focused on Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (25 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (22 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers). Lorenz Demey collaborates with scholars based in Belgium. Lorenz Demey's co-authors include Hans Smessaert, Barteld Kooi, Jörg H. Siekmann and Dov M. Gabbay and has published in prestigious journals such as Synthese, Symmetry and Journal of Philosophical Logic.

In The Last Decade

Lorenz Demey

41 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

Lorenz Demey
Wesley H. Holliday United States
Richard L. Mendelsohn United States
Rosanna Keefe United Kingdom
Joke Meheus Belgium
Perry Smith United States
Lorenz Demey
Citations per year, relative to Lorenz Demey Lorenz Demey (= 1×) peers Hans Smessaert

Countries citing papers authored by Lorenz Demey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lorenz Demey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorenz Demey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorenz Demey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lorenz Demey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorenz Demey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorenz Demey. The network helps show where Lorenz Demey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lorenz Demey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lorenz Demey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lorenz Demey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lorenz Demey. Lorenz Demey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Demey, Lorenz & Hans Smessaert. (2024). Aristotelian and Boolean Properties of the Keynes-Johnson Octagon of Opposition. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 53(5). 1265–1290. 1 indexed citations
2.
Demey, Lorenz, et al.. (2024). Alpha-Structures and Ladders in Logical Geometry. Studia Logica. 113(6). 1713–1748.
3.
Demey, Lorenz, et al.. (2024). Boolean Subtypes of the U4 Hexagon of Opposition. Axioms. 13(2). 76–76. 1 indexed citations
4.
Demey, Lorenz, et al.. (2023). The Modal Logic of Aristotelian Diagrams. Axioms. 12(5). 471–471. 2 indexed citations
5.
Demey, Lorenz, et al.. (2023). Logic-Sensitivity and Bitstring Semantics in the Square of Opposition. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 52(6). 1703–1721. 4 indexed citations
6.
Demey, Lorenz, et al.. (2023). Morphisms Between Aristotelian Diagrams. Logica Universalis. 18(1-2). 49–83. 4 indexed citations
7.
Smessaert, Hans & Lorenz Demey. (2023). Aristotelian Diagrams for the Proportional Quantifier ‘Most’. Axioms. 12(3). 236–236. 1 indexed citations
8.
Demey, Lorenz. (2021). Logic-Sensitivity of Aristotelian Diagrams in Non-Normal Modal Logics. Axioms. 10(3). 128–128. 5 indexed citations
9.
Demey, Lorenz, et al.. (2019). The perfect surprise: a new analysis in dynamic epistemic logic. Logic Journal of IGPL. 28(3). 341–362. 1 indexed citations
10.
Demey, Lorenz. (2018). Boolean considerations on John Buridan's octagons of opposition. History and Philosophy of Logic. 40(2). 116–134. 13 indexed citations
11.
Demey, Lorenz & Hans Smessaert. (2017). Combinatorial Bitstring Semantics for Arbitrary Logical Fragments. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 47(2). 325–363. 31 indexed citations
12.
Demey, Lorenz, et al.. (2016). Thomas van Aquino, niet-normale modale logica's en het probleem van toekomstige contingenties. Tijdschrift voor Philosophie. 1 indexed citations
13.
Demey, Lorenz, et al.. (2016). De logische geometrie van Johannes Buridanus' modale achthoek. Tijdschrift voor Philosophie. 79(2). 1 indexed citations
14.
Demey, Lorenz. (2015). The Dynamics of Surprise. Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série. 58(230). 251–277. 2 indexed citations
15.
Smessaert, Hans & Lorenz Demey. (2015). La géométrie logique du dodécaèdre rhombique des oppositions. Lirias (KU Leuven). 3 indexed citations
16.
Demey, Lorenz & Hans Smessaert. (2015). Shape Heuristics in Aristotelian Diagrams. 35–45. 2 indexed citations
17.
Demey, Lorenz. (2014). Believing in Logic and Philosophy. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1 indexed citations
18.
Demey, Lorenz. (2014). Ockham on the (In)fallibility of Intuitive Cognition. 17(1). 193–209.
19.
Demey, Lorenz, et al.. (2013). Logic and Probability. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 2013. 10 indexed citations
20.
Demey, Lorenz & Hans Smessaert. (2013). Jean-Yves Béziau and Gillman Payette (eds.), The Square of Opposition: A General Framework for Cognition. Bern, Peter Lang, 2012. Jean-Yves Béziau and Dale Jacquette (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Basel, Birkhäuser (Springer), 2012 (joint review). 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026