Lora D. Baum

16 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

Lora D. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Urology 132
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 163
  • Dermatology 107
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 62
  • Oncology 242
Replace Jeffrey W. Janata with:
Jeffrey W. Janata United States
Ming‐Ping Wu Taiwan
Eduardo A. Colón United States
Giuseppe Zanni Italy
K. B. Segraves United States
Mels F. van Driel Netherlands
Jarmila Szilasiová Slovakia
Kate M. Rancourt Canada
Katie L. Druce United Kingdom
Kaatje Toye Belgium
Lora D. Baum relative to Jeffrey W. Janata United States Jeffrey W. Janata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Jeffrey W. Janata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lora D. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lora D. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lora D. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lora D. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lora D. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lora D. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lora D. Baum. The network helps show where Lora D. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lora D. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lora D. Baum Line = papers co-authored together Lora D. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2011239
2 2001150
3 200962
4 200151
5 199740
6 200324
7 198622
8
Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a self-hypnosis intervention available on the web for cancer survivors with insomnia
201020
9 200917
10 198615
11 198715
12
[Diagnostic and prognostic value of the brain stem reflexes in severe post-traumatic coma].
197710
13 20108
14 20147
15 20055
16 19973

About Lora D. Baum

Lora D. Baum is a scholar working on Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science, Urology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Hair Growth and Disorders (3 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (132 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (163 citations), Dermatology (107 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (62 citations) and Oncology (242 citations). Lora D. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth L. McGarvey, Relana Pinkerton, Holly R. Lord, Frances P. Thorndike, Lee M. Ritterband, Elaine T. Bailey, Leah Farrell‐Carnahan, Victor C. Baum, Laura M. Rogers and Gina R. Petroni. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Psycho-Oncology, Cancer Practice and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact