Ming‐Ping Wu

78 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ming‐Ping Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Urology 288
  • Rheumatology 507
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 222
  • Reproductive Medicine 121
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 172
Replace Barbara Robinson with:
Barbara Robinson United States
Simon Jackson United Kingdom
Christine L. Thompson United States
Giuseppe Zanni Italy
Mels F. van Driel Netherlands
Anja Dietel Germany
Colin Markland United States
Janet R. Guthrie Australia
Maria Celeste Osório Wender Brazil
Marco Capece Italy
Ming‐Ping Wu relative to Barbara Robinson United States Barbara Robinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Barbara Robinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Ping Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Ping Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Ping Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Ping Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Ping Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Ping Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Ping Wu. The network helps show where Ming‐Ping Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Ping Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Ping Wu Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Ping Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014104
2 200967
3 201762
4 200349
5 201048
6 201835
7 201234
8 201334
9 201733
10 201531
11 201930
12 201530
13 200626
14 200625
15 200824
16 199724
17 201224
18 201224
19 201322
20 201921

About Ming‐Ping Wu

Ming‐Ping Wu is a scholar working on Urology, Rheumatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (45 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (24 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (21 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (19 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (14 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (10 papers), Hernia repair and management (7 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (288 citations), Rheumatology (507 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (222 citations), Reproductive Medicine (121 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (172 citations). Ming‐Ping Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, India and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Shih‐Feng Weng, Chung‐Han Ho, Jhi‐Joung Wang, Cheng‐Yu Long, Ya‐Wen Hsu, Eing‐Mei Tsai, Kuan‐Hui Huang, Charles Lung-Cheng Huang, Chao‐Hsiun Tang and Huey‐Juan Lin. Their work appears in journals such as International Urogynecology Journal, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, BioMed Research International, PLoS ONE and European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026