Long Chiau Ming
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Food Science top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Khang Wen GohTahir Mehmood KhanKah Seng LeeBey Hing GohMd. Moklesur Rahman SarkerYaser Mohammed Al‐WorafiMd. Sanower HossainKah Hay Yuen
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (45 papers)Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (21 papers)Antibiotic Use and Resistance (20 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
In The Last Decade
Long Chiau Ming
395 papers receiving 6.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
- Molecular Biology 1.4k
- Plant Science 670
- General Health Professions 549
- Food Science 535
- Oncology 510
Countries citing papers authored by Long Chiau Ming
This map shows the geographic impact of Long Chiau Ming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Long Chiau Ming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Long Chiau Ming more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Long Chiau Ming
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Long Chiau Ming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Long Chiau Ming. The network helps show where Long Chiau Ming may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Long Chiau Ming
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Long Chiau Ming. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Long Chiau Ming based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Long Chiau Ming. Long Chiau Ming is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 137 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | Validation of online learning in pharmacy education: Effectiveness and student insight | 12 |
| 20 | 12 |
About Long Chiau Ming
Long Chiau Ming is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Family Practice, having authored 437 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (45 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (21 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (387 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (183 citations) and Toxicology (204 citations). Long Chiau Ming has collaborated with scholars based in Malaysia, Brunei and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Khang Wen Goh, Tahir Mehmood Khan, Kah Seng Lee, Bey Hing Goh, Md. Moklesur Rahman Sarker, Yaser Mohammed Al‐Worafi, Md. Sanower Hossain, Kah Hay Yuen, Tin Wui Wong and Muhammad Abdul Hadi. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.