Lois DeBakey
Impact in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Papers in
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 3
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation 1
-
- Health Sciences Research and Education 4
Lois DeBakey
31 papers receiving 194 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Medical Terminology 3
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 55
- History and Philosophy of Science 27
- Family Practice 12
- General Health Professions 91
Countries citing papers authored by Lois DeBakey
This map shows the geographic impact of Lois DeBakey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lois DeBakey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lois DeBakey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lois DeBakey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lois DeBakey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lois DeBakey. The network helps show where Lois DeBakey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Lois DeBakey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 44 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 28 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 13 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 11 | |
| 8 | The Scientific Journal: Editorial Policies and Practices; Guidelines for Editors, Reviewers, and Authors | 1976 | 11 |
| 9 | 1982 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1966 | 5 | |
| 15 | The ethics and economics of high-technology medicine. | 1983 | 5 |
| 16 | Rewriting and the by-line: is the author the writer? | 1974 | 5 |
| 17 | 1966 | 5 | |
| 18 | The art of persuasion: logic and language in proposal writing. | 1978 | 5 |
| 19 | 1982 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1970 | 4 |
About Lois DeBakey
Lois DeBakey is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, History and Philosophy of Science, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 39 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic Writing and Publishing (5 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (2 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper) and Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (3 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (55 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (27 citations), Family Practice (12 citations) and General Health Professions (91 citations). Lois DeBakey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Phil R. Manning and Michael E. DeBakey. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cardiology, JAMA, Anesthesia & Analgesia, New England Journal of Medicine and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.