Damon M. Seils
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Kevin A. SchulmanNeal J. MeropolKevin P. WeinfurtDaniel P. SulmasyAlan B. AstrowRobert M. CaliffEllyn MiccoJeremy Sugarman
- Topics
- Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers)Ethics in medical practice (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesZimbabweUganda
In The Last Decade
Damon M. Seils
15 papers receiving 386 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 238
- General Health Professions 152
- Economics and Econometrics 150
- Pharmacology 115
- Physiology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Damon M. Seils
This map shows the geographic impact of Damon M. Seils's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Damon M. Seils with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Damon M. Seils more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Damon M. Seils
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Damon M. Seils. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Damon M. Seils. The network helps show where Damon M. Seils may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Damon M. Seils
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Damon M. Seils. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Damon M. Seils based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Damon M. Seils. Damon M. Seils is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 112 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 112 | |
| 13 | Sex differences in the referral process for invasive cardiac procedures. | 13 |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | Quality Assessment in Contracting for Tertiary Care Services by HMOs | 3 |
About Damon M. Seils
Damon M. Seils is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (4 citations), Pharmacology (115 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (238 citations). Damon M. Seils has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Zimbabwe and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Kevin A. Schulman, Neal J. Meropol, Kevin P. Weinfurt, Daniel P. Sulmasy, Alan B. Astrow, Robert M. Califf, Kevin P. Weinfurt, Ellyn Micco, Jeremy Sugarman and Justin W. Timbie. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.