Liye Zhou

2.0k citations
40 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Liye Zhou

39 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Liye Zhou
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Cancer Research 214
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 165
  • Immunology 180
  • Oncology 224
  • Molecular Biology 440
Replace Tingting Yang with:
Tingting Yang China
Simona Mastroeni Italy
Ping Yu China
Rüçhan Uslu Türkiye
César A. Rodríguez Spain
Abolfazl Avan Canada
Chun‐Kai Fang Taiwan
Emilie Friberg Sweden
Cindy K. Blair United States
Terje Risberg Norway
Liye Zhou relative to Tingting Yang China Tingting Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Tingting Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liye Zhou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liye Zhou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liye Zhou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liye Zhou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liye Zhou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liye Zhou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liye Zhou. The network helps show where Liye Zhou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liye Zhou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liye Zhou Line = papers co-authored together Liye Zhou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019179
2 2015109
3 202173
4 201960
5 201852
6 201944
7 201741
8 202041
9 201934
10 201932
11 201932
12 201731
13 202028
14 201726
15 202124
16 201824
17 201619
18 201319
19 201917
20 201216

About Liye Zhou

Liye Zhou is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cancer Research, Immunology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (7 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (6 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (6 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (4 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (3 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (214 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (165 citations), Immunology (180 citations), Oncology (224 citations) and Molecular Biology (440 citations). Liye Zhou has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Hongmei Yu, Ruifeng Liang, Runlian He, Ravindra Uppaluri, Xiaojing Ma, Tenny Mudianto, Rachel Riley, Xiaocheng Wang, M. Mahmood Hussain and Hirofumi Shibata. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, International Psychogeriatrics, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology and Clinical Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact