Adam Taube

69 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Adam Taube
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 773
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 670
  • Physiology 496
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 329
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 325
Replace Stacey S. Cofield with:
Stacey S. Cofield United States
Till Ittermann Germany
Janet K. Snell‐Bergeon United States
Yasufumi Doi Japan
Hsin‐Bang Leu Taiwan
Konstantinos A. Toulis Greece
Gülay Hergenç Türkiye
Jørgen Jeppesen Denmark
Marcos Antônio Tambascia Brazil
Benjamin Woolf United Kingdom
Adam Taube relative to Stacey S. Cofield United States Stacey S. Cofield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stacey S. Cofield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Taube

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Taube's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Taube with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Taube more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Taube

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Taube. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Taube. The network helps show where Adam Taube may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Taube

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Taube. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Taube based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Taube. Adam Taube is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 1
3 10
4 7
5 9
6 172
7 12
8 17
9
[Count on your beliefs. Bayes' theorem in diagnosis].
5
10 22
11
Risk in numbers: Dilemmas in the transformation of genetic knowledge from research to people - The case of hereditary cancer
1
12 70
13 121
14
Toward an objective method of mitotic figure counting and its prognostic significance in bladder cancer.
2
15 14
16
One- versus two-view mammography screening. A prospective population-based study.
14
17
Pulmonary function after autologous bone marrow transplantation in children.
26
18 2
19 9
20 14

About Adam Taube

Adam Taube is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 72 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (7 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (325 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (773 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (670 citations). Adam Taube has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Erik Thurfjell, G. E. F. Lundell, Leif Tallstedt, Þórarinn Gíslason, Göran Wallin, Ove Törring, J.‐G. Ljunggren, G Boman, Gösta Eriksson and Magnus Almqvist. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026