Alison Hicks

57 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

Alison Hicks
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Library and Information Sciences 198
  • Communication 74
  • Information Systems 151
  • Education 146
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 58
Replace Rebekah Willson with:
Rebekah Willson Canada
Amy J. Catalano United States
Pat Gannon‐Leary United Kingdom
Muhammad Asim Qayyum Australia
Beth S. Woodard United States
Patricia Dewdney Canada
Denise Koufogiannakis Canada
Jenny Bossaller United States
Alison Yeoman United Kingdom
Siân Spink United Kingdom
Alison Hicks relative to Rebekah Willson Canada Rebekah Willson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Rebekah Willson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Hicks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Hicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Hicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Hicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Hicks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Hicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Hicks. The network helps show where Alison Hicks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison Hicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison Hicks Line = papers co-authored together Alison Hicks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201648
2 201838
3 201227
4 202025
5 201924
6 201024
7 202223
8 201320
9 201820
10 202118
11 201117
12 201517
13 199815
14 202114
15 202012
16 201411
17 201110
18 202210
19 201510
20 20209

About Alison Hicks

Alison Hicks is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Education and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 67 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (21 papers), Library Science and Administration (14 papers), Web and Library Services (11 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (8 papers), Online and Blended Learning (6 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (4 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (198 citations), Communication (74 citations), Information Systems (151 citations), Education (146 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (58 citations). Alison Hicks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Annemareé Lloyd, Andrew Booth, Geoff Walton, Nadine E. Andrew, Stephen Colagiuri, Monique F. Kilkenny, Adrian Howkins, Tara Purvis, Dominique A. Cadilhac and Pamela J. McKenzie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Information Literacy, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, portal Libraries and the Academy, Journal of Documentation and Journal of Information Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact