Lisa M. Smith

1.8k total citations
16 papers, 717 citations indexed

About

Lisa M. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Lisa M. Smith has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 717 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Lisa M. Smith's work include Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (3 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (3 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers). Lisa M. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (3 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (3 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers). Lisa M. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Lisa M. Smith's co-authors include Stephen J. Peroutka, Elaine Willmore, Nicola J. Curtin, Caroline A. Austin, Vibha N. Lama, Andrew Flint, Paul H. Krebsbach, Fernando J. Martínez, Victor J. Thannickal and Hui Liao and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Lisa M. Smith

15 papers receiving 691 citations

Peers

Lisa M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Molecular Biology 303
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 169
  • Genetics 143
  • Surgery 141
  • Oncology 132
Replace Lijun Zhou with:
Lijun Zhou China
Stephen M. Carlin Australia
Stephen MacLennan Italy
Hsiao-Ling Wu United States
Takahiro Kondo Japan
István Kertész Hungary
Jason T. Ross United States
Bart P. Keogh United States
Marina Montali Italy
P.A. Robson France
Lijun Zhou China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Lisa M. Smith
Lisa M. Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Lisa M. Smith
Lisa M. Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa M. Smith. The network helps show where Lisa M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa M. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa M. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa M. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa M. Smith. Lisa M. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 13
2 61
3 1
4 10
5
Does posting in an online community encourage young people to disclose sexual assault or abuse
2
6 226
7 1
8 94
9 1
10 59
11 4
12 6
13
Lifting the veil of secrecy: Mandatory child abuse reporting statutes may encourage the Catholic Church to report priests who molest children.
4
14 15
15 10
16 210

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026